Richard Rogers on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:01:19 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime-ann> [ann] Richard Rogers and Anat Ben-David: Palestinian-Israeli Conflict Language Analysis Paper |
S T U D Y=A0 A N N O U N C E M E N T October 2005 Coming to Terms. A conflict analysis of the usage, in official and unofficial sources, of =91security fence,=92 =91apartheid wall,=92 and other terms for the structure between Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Richard Rogers and Anat Ben-David EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The official terms are =91security fence=92 on the Israeli side, and =91apartheid wall=92 on the Palestinian. Both terms fuse two contextually charged notions to describe the construction project. Beyond the two official terms, the structure has been given other names within the region and beyond. The study describes the connotations and implications of approximately ten terms used for the structure, including the names given by diplomatic and NGO sources appearing in the media space (e.g., the International Court of Justice=92s =91West Bank wall=92) and by news organizations covering the issue (e.g., =91barrier wall=92).=A0 Using data from Google News, which includes official and unofficial sources, the study, more specifically, offers a media monitoring method, sensitive to the complications of relying on Web-based news aggregators. Significantly, the study seeks to create conflict indicators from the shifting language employed for the structure by Palestinian and Israeli officials. The analysis seeks to learn whether and when Israelis and Palestinians 'come to terms.' Which particular constellation of Palestinian, Israeli and other actors share language? What are the implications of that shared language for a peace arrangement?=A0 The study also provides analysis of the contribution of news coverage to the conflict, concentrating on how Israeli and Palestinian official language changes when international news leaves the scene, and when officials themselves change scenes, e.g., speaking at the podium in the Rose Garden at the U.S. White House. The Palestinians and Israelis choose their words differently, it was found. The Israeli government is relatively consistent (yet alone) in their term usage; the Palestinian officials adopt their terminology according to the setting, using different terms for the structure in diplomatic and international court settings than =91at home.=92 Having identified =91setting=92 as an important variable in the study of language use as conflict indicator, the study also provides an analysis of diplomatic language in key debates on the obstacle at the U.N. Security Council, providing a kind of world map (or graph) of the conflict. Finally, comparing the diplomatic to other settings, we ask, which setting is hosting shared language, if any? At the U.N., we found 'language blocs.'=A0Where could shared language otherwise be hosted? In sum it was found that, at particular moments in time, Israeli and Palestinian actors =91come to terms=92 most significantly around =91separation wall,=92 coupling the Israeli left-of-center adjective and the Palestinian noun, implying a peace-related arrangement distinctive from either side=92s official position (as well as the current official and 'people-to-people' peace plans), and ultimately undesirable to those who use and share the term. Download the study Richard Rogers and Anat Ben-David, "Coming to Terms:=A0A conflict analysis of the usage, in official and unofficial sources, of =91security fence,=92 =91apartheid wall,=92 and other terms for the structure between Israel and the Palestinian Territories," 2005. http://www.govcom.org/publications/full_list/ben- david_rogers_coming_to_terms_2oct.pdf Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Advanced Network Research Group, Cambridge Security Programme, University of Cambridge, U.K. Appreciation is extended to Andrei Mogoutov (Aguidel.com) and Zachary O=92Connor Devereaux (Ryerson / York Universities) for analytical and graph _______________________________________________ nettime-ann mailing list nettime-ann@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ann