Eric Hoffsten on 30 Nov 2000 07:17:44 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] FWD: Amazon Fights Union Activity |
>Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Amazon Fights Union Activity >Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:45:22 -0500 (EST) > >\----------------------------------------------------------/ > >Amazon Fights Union Activity >http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/29/technology/29AMAZ.html > >November 29, 2000 > >By STEVEN GREENHOUSE > >Amazon.com has come out swinging in its fight to stop a new >unionization drive, telling employees that unions are a greedy, >for-profit business and advising managers on ways to detect when a >group of workers is trying to back a union. > > A section on Amazon's internal Web site gives supervisors >antiunion material to pass on to employees, saying that unions mean >strife and possible strikes and that while unions are certain to >charge expensive dues, they cannot guarantee improved wages or >benefits. > > The Web site advises managers on warning signs that a union is >trying to organize. Among the signs that Amazon notes are "hushed >conversations when you approach which have not occurred before," >and "small group huddles breaking up in silence on the approach of >the supervisor." > > Other warning signs, according to the site, are an increase in >complaints, a decrease in quality of work, growing aggressiveness >and dawdling in the lunchroom and restrooms. > > Amazon, one of the leaders in electronic retailing, has stepped up >its antiunion activities the last week after two unions and an >independent organizing group announced plans to speed efforts to >unionize Amazon during the holiday e-shopping rush. The organizing >drive is the most ambitious one ever undertaken in the high- >technology sector, where the nation's labor movement has yet to >establish a foothold. > > The Communications Workers of America has undertaken a campaign to >unionize 400 customer-service representatives in Seattle, where >Amazon is based. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union and >the Prewitt Organizing Fund, an independent organizing group, are >seeking to unionize some 5,000 workers at Amazon's eight >distribution centers across the country. The unionization drive has >gained momentum because many workers are upset about layoffs at >Amazon last January and about the sharp drop in the value of their >stock options. > > One chapter on Amazon's internal Web site, which provides a rare >internal glimpse at how a company is fighting off a union, is >headlined, "Reasons a Union is Not Desirable." > > "Unions actively foster distrust toward supervisors," the Web site >says. "They also create an uncooperative attitude among associates >by leading them to think they are `untouchable' with a union." > > The Web site, which calls the company's workers associates, adds: >"Unions limit associate incentives. Merit increases are contrary to >union philosophy." > > A union supporter who insisted on anonymity and acknowledged >seeking to embarrass the company over its antiunion campaign made a >copy of the Web site material available to The New York Times. >Amazon officials confirmed that the material came from the >company's Web site. > > Patty Smith, an Amazon spokeswoman, said the main purpose of the >Web site material was to tell supervisors what they can do to >oppose a union and what actions by managers violate laws barring >retaliation against workers who support unionization. > > For instance, the Web site said supervisors could tell workers >that the company preferred to deal with them directly, rather than >through an outside organization. > > It also said supervisors could tell workers about the benefits >they enjoy. As for the don'ts, the Web site warns supervisors not >to threaten workers with firings or reduce income or discontinue >any privileges to any union supporter. > > Ms. Smith declined to name the lawyers the company had hired to >work on the material. > > Union leaders said in interviews yesterday that their organizing >drive was going somewhat worse than they had expected largely >because of the unexpected aggressiveness of Amazon's antiunion >efforts. Over the last two weeks, managers have held a half-dozen >"all hands" meetings for customer service workers in Seattle, where >managers have argued how unionizing would be bad for Amazon. > > Marcus Courtney, co-founder of the Washington Alliance of >Technological Workers, an affiliate of the communications workers' >union, said, "This shows how Amazon, despite its public statements >that this is a decision we let our employees make themselves and we >trust them to make the right decisions, all these meetings and the >internal Web site and their manuals show that Amazon management is >trying to take this basic democratic decision away from the workers >and make it themselves." > > Ms. Smith denied that the company was not letting workers make up >their own minds. "We hired intelligent and dedicated employees, and >we trust them to make decisions about what's best for their >future," she said. "But obviously we don't believe a union is best >for their future or our customers." > > In large, bold letters, the Web site tells supervisors: "A union >promotes and thrives upon problems between supervisors and >employees. Front- line supervisors who deal effectively with >associate problems avoid associates believing they need a union." > > Duane Stillwell, president of the Prewitt Organizing Fund, said: >"It's unfortunate that this vaunted high- tech company is just >saying the same crude things that factory owners have been saying >for 100 years about unions. They're just scaring people out of >wanting to do the right thing." > > > >The New York Times on the Web >http://www.nytimes.com > >/-----------------------------------------------------------------\ > > >Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the >most authoritative news coverage on the Web, >updated throughout the day. > >Become a member today! It's free! > >http://www.nytimes.com?eta > > _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold