| propaganda on Tue, 22 May 2001 17:08:50 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] Marina Grzinic on 0100101110110101.ORG |
The Fake As More
by Marina Grzinic
Achieving what no one even three years ago could foresee as the
necessary resolution to the dialectical impasse posed by the
object-form critical dilemma, www.0100101110110101.org's Net Art
both asserts and transcends objectness and formality; or, perhaps
better stated, it represents a synthesis of the form and object
into what might be called form-object art. Resolving at one master
stroke the problem of content without compromising the purity of the
nonreferential object as such, www.0100101110110101.org's work, by
recoding other Net Art, nevertheless introduces new content and a new
concept, in the total phenomenological sense, by actually representing
the actions of someone other than the Net Artists plagiarized. That
is, in their real meaning, www.0100101110110101.org is Net Art plus,
Net Art and more, and the implications to be extracted from them will
no doubt occupy a segment of the Net.art community for years to come.
In their double orientation between past and present,
www.0100101110110101.org represents an advance in another respect;
in no other form but copy and fake can the thing be so sharply
distinguished from its self, the "an sich," or essence, from
the "für sich," or reality. For by reproducing existing Net Art
www.0100101110110101.org both receives the sanction of its predecessors
and at the same time negates the attempt to observe any new formal
development, thus shifting the entire phenomenon to a superior,
that is, critical, level. What is at work here is lived experience
relived, or more accurately, the coded object recoded. In spite of the
apparent similarity of both www.0100101110110101.org and the Net Art
sites it plagiarizes, there are profound differences. The home page
of rhizome.org copied and disassembled by www.0100101110110101.org
reveals, once dissected into its source code, traces of different code
layers created by different Rhizome web designer over a longer period,
whereas the data under review here was completed within one day.
Looking at www.0100101110110101.org, we see a lack of development in
the artists' refusal to succumb to either a unilateral linear statement
or an expression of complete circularity, but rather a synthesis of
both in what might be called circulinear art, neither "either or" but
"both and." Moreover, the above is made perceptually concrete to the
observer through a process of heightened simultaneity. For on first
viewing www.0100101110110101.org, we are reminded of Wittgenstein's
comment,
"Seeing as... is not part of perception. And for that reason it is
like seeing and again not like."[1]
We are clearly in the presence of a dilemma. In answer to
Wittgenstein's question, what is the criterion of the visual
experience?, his obvious answer, "the representation of what is
seen"[2], simply will not do. In addition to what is seen, there is the
known: the preordinare relationship of the subject-object synthesis
paravisually determined in the Kantian sense; as Merleau-Ponty has
observed,
"Le propre du Kantisme est de n'admettre que deux types d'expériences
qui soient pourvues d'une structure a priori: celle d'un mode
d'objets externes, celle des états du sens intime."[3]
Self-clarification is obtained through the web pages
themselves. Through serial repetition, the artist's search for
a style and an ontology, an artistic expression of ontological
ends, is consolidated in particular works that sum up the gains
of painful and anxious exploration of viable form, at least
temporarily. They reiterate the combinative passion of artist and
critic that is the achievement and the ultimate responsibility of
www.0100101110110101.org: in essence, the re-creative process. To
say this is by no means to slight previous Net Art as such. But
any comparison of, for example, jodi.org and its appropriation on
www.0100101110110101.org would have to concede that the latter's
power and potentiality, its cleaner code and its surplus of irony,
vastly intensifies the conflict between them. However, these are but
stylistic differences, at best provisional. On second viewing, one
begins to be more profoundly conscious of and receptive to a radically
new and philosophical element in the work of www.0100101110110101.org
that is precluded in the work of jodi and on the Rhizome home page,
i.e., the denial of originality, both in its most blatant manifestation
(the theft as such) and in its subtle, insouciant undertones of static
objectivity (the telescoping of time). While the identity we share in
jodi's art as our the digital art of our time, is deepened, broadened,
and made, of all things, joyous, whereas www.0100101110110101.org's
art is neither deepening nor broadening nor, if anything, joyous. On
the contrary, it is surface, narrow, and, most especially, tragic, for
one is forcefully reminded at every line and turn that it represents
the ontological predicament of our time, indeed of every living being:
inauthentic experience. It is, in a word, fakes.
Marina Grzinic
Ljubljana, Slovenia
margrz@zrc-sazu.si
Footnotes
1. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, translated by
G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford 1978, p.197
2. Ibid., p.232/198. 3. Merleau-Ponty, La structure du comportement,
Paris 1977, p.180.
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
www.0100101110110101.ORG
_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold