Kali Tal on Tue, 22 May 2001 18:12:09 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> no people. |
Mark Dery, what is your investment in attempting to condemn and silence experimental writing and theoretical discourse on nettime? We all have our 'd' keys, as well as access to email filters if we truly wish to remain untroubled by writing that bores, annoys, or offends us. Who, truly, reads all of the messages posted to nettime or, for that matter, any other email list? What is the advantage in being prescriptive? Safire's insistence on the superiority of his language over others' language because of its conformity to "acceptable standards" of "correct speech" is inextricably tied to his political conservatism. It's a useful rhetorical ploy -- ridicule an opponent's grammar and sidestep the content of her or his critique. Standardization of speech is inherently political, as any history of the development of official grammars will reveal. (Dale Spender's work on this is particularly interesting.) The exploration of new concepts requires a period of initially fuzzy or "ectoplasmic" language until understanding of the concepts solidify (and hence, in Barthes terms, become dull and nauseating) and definitions are arrived at by consensus or imposition. These explorations require more, rather than less, intellectual work since definitions do not rest conveniently in hand but have to be arrived at over time. At this level of discourse words and phrases often act as simple placeholders for terms that are still evolving towards more specific and accurate descriptors. Running around and demanding clarity at all stages of discussion is counter-productive. >Trying to pin down your meaning, here, is like trying >to hit a blob of mercury with a nail gun. A nail gun is hardly the tool one should choose to capture mercury. You'd be far more successful scooping it into a bottle with a thin piece of cardboard. Your choice of metaphors is illustrative of the problem with your argument for clarity. If all you've got is the nail gun you will be endlessly frustrated by the fragmentation of the mercury into pieces that are smaller and smaller and less easy even to hit with a nail. The same goes for demanding clarity and simplicity in experimentations with new concepts and language. Kali Tal _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold