Ned Rossiter on Wed, 1 Aug 2001 13:26:49 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Enculturating Net-Porn: Interview with Libidot |
'Enculturating Net-Porn: Interview with Libidot' July, 2001 Katrien Jacobs/Libidot is a Belgian academic based at Emerson College, Boston. Her recent academic research and publications have been on internet pornography, censorship issues and Shu Lea Cheang. She is currently wearing a different hat at the moment, and is travelling in Japan, Australia, and then consolidating work in Europe and the US. She works as Libidot to produce web based material that includes an installation recently held in Perth, a webdiary, interviews, imagery and writing on net/video porn artists and performance. Libidot is her method of producing work during the act of travelling, an ongoing moody-adventurous and raw act of writing and gathering information that complements the unrelentless academic quest for publications as well as the peeking sexual drive or libido. libidot@earthlink.net http://www.libidot.org http://pages.emerson.edu/Katrien_Jacobs Ned Rossiter: First of all, can you tell us what this project is about? Libidot: The working title for this project is Porn Around the World. I am travelling around the world to investigate how different cultures interact with Internet pornography in the arts, sex industries, mainstream and independent media. I am in the process of writing a book about Internet pornography and decided to do ethnographic research into communities, individuals, spaces, sites and how they are affected by the globalised culture of Internet porn. I am interested in the tension between the overly promoted lure of pornographic screens and consumers who embody/act out/reinterpret information in their actual lives, work and political environments. A lot of this interplay between commodified screen-fantasies and actuality is complex and intensely explored by media artists and underground performers. I try to meet with them and learn about the 'coming to life' of current porn fantasies. I am also questioning and dissolving the roles of 'academic researcher' and his/her object of study as a 'pornographer'. I have declared myself to be an 'obscene doctor' in that I am interested in my own mental-sexual energy as a driving force for my research. I am perhaps driven by the same sort of energy that once compelled artists Zoot and Genant of Artporn Amsterdam to go to bed with a live octopus in Japan, a capricious and technology-dependent energy that has encouraged several generations of web-writers, nomadic researchers and artists to commit acts of exhibitionism. In my case exhibitionism is interwoven with a diligent or driven study and observation of others. I try to incorporate everyday scholarly activity, visiting places, meeting with individuals, and conceiving of ideas, as a kind of obscene consciousness that is not to be segregated from the daily transactions constituting Internet porn and art itself. The sphere of energy that drives us disparate scholars to study others and describe them as 'objects of study', remaining behind the scenes yet getting aroused by our interconnected queries, that is what interests me. NR: Porn-around-the-world: why, then, these particular countries (Japan, Australia, Belgium, USA)? Is there anything special about these places that puts them on your itinerary? Perhaps you could say something about how these places relate to your recent academic research on censorship issues around the Internet, and the work of Internet porn-artists? Libidot: I have lived and worked in most of the countries and continents where I do my research - Belgium, Australia, USA. Then there are the other cultures such as Japan and Slovenia where I have started doing work more recently and received a very good response. I find it to hard to find an adequate focus for my research and have started to adapt my identity as a 'mobile researcher' to the object of study. In 1997 I moved from Washington DC to Perth, Western Australia, after a number of online correspondences and phone-calls with a university there. It was very difficult for me to arrive and work in Perth and I started to develop an online identity in order to escape from daily boredom and stress. To some extent, online searching and writing can be very enriching for the libido and I fell in love with a person who gave me more sexual satisfaction than I had ever received. I met up with him in Brussels and we lived together for a while as two amorous self-absorbed geeks. After our break-up in Boston two years later, I travelled to Ljubjana, Slovenia and came up with the idea that the law of gravity in real travel can positively complement romantic-nomadic-obsessive ideas and correspondences. I had been struggling with an excessive desire for sex and discovered that the desire balanced out as soon as I started travelling. I like sensing new environments and use travel, pragmatic searching, exhausting my body, and sharpening intuition as a way to construct 'peepzones' appropriate for my research. Those peepzones are crafted by diverse people in existing places and thus complicate and complement the Internet sex drive. I work with people who understand and share my mindset and want to talk to me about their own relation to pornography. A lot of those people are 'porn artists' - i.e. artists who either work with and/or subvert commercial pornography, or artists who have a peculiar bond with sexual or obsessive-libidinal energy that is not always directly manifest in their work. The censorship issues are different in every country but governments are mostly simultaneously encouraging and restricting online porn. Of course it is not really porn itself that is endangering citizens, except for children in developing countries whose services are massively traded through the Internet, but the libidinal energy that has infested the Internet since its foundation. That energy that still zips through big brother mainframe and is used and/or purchased by hackers, geeks, webgirrls and academics to commit to excessive (rather than sexually explicit) acts of communication. When I moved to Perth, I discovered some reactionary pieces of legislation (i.e. WA Censorship Act of 1996) that tried to argue that citizens ought to be very careful with this new influx of 'obscene' energy through the Internet. This attitude stems from the idea that pornographic online correspondences or transactions, just like the glow of excessive advertising, may have a strong affect on individuals and their fantasies, turning the local or national unconscious of everyday educated citizens into a transnational smut-engine. Meanwhile similar types of neo-conservative legislation have arisen from state and federal governments in the UK, USA, Australia, and France. What gets officially scrutinised by the new pieces of legislation is the up/down loading by individuals and ISP's of sexually explicit materials depicting taboo areas of sexuality - child pornography, bestiality, sadomasochism. Right now we are entering a second phase of Internet censorship where the communicative energy itself is more successfully attacked and obliterated. For example, commercial portals such as Yahoo are in the process of trying to destroy messageboards and chatrooms constructed on their 'free' servers, where illegal pornographers may indeed arrange their transactions. The problem is that many mundane, often young web-users and activists are equally hit by this destruction, especially since so many of them are now using the commercial portals for non-commercial activities. In Massachusetts, for instance, it has become illegal to distribute any depictions of nude minors and children (including babies). Several months before this law came out, a couple of online gay communities, more particularly urination and buttock fetishists, were hit really hard by this decision as their sites were aggressively removed by commercial host portals. The sites included messageboards where the new censorship legislation was actively being discussed. You might think of this as an inevitable clash, but it would be the equivalent to obsessive online academics and activists waking up to the total destruction/removal of <nettime>. It is for the very same reason that I decided to place my website <http://www.libidot.org> outside the boundaries of my academic institution on a server that agreed, after much negotiation, to support the pornographic premises of my work. Even though Emerson College supports my research through grants for travel and web design, the libidot.org component of this research is something they could easily remove from their server without my consultation. There is really nothing like spectacular porn or taboo graphics on that site, but it is a component of larger fringe knowledge bases (both academic and otherwise) that are not yet fully acknowledged as valid porn research. NR: You began your trip in Japan. What have you been up to there? Who have you met, and what are your impressions of pornographic culture in Japan? For instance, is there a clear distinction between mainstream, commercial porn, and a sort of avant-garde underground? How does the underground, assuming one exists, frame its concerns - theoretically, aesthetically, culturally? Libidot: I first became interested in Japan through Shu Lea Cheang's work and her 'digital sci-fi porn' movie I.K.U. I was invited by Chris Berry, Audrey Yue and Fran Martin, the editors of the forthcoming book _Mobile Cultures: Queer Asia and New Media_ (Duke University Press), to write an article about this movie in terms of how it depicts Japanese sexual 'underground' communities. This was a difficult thing to do since I had never lived or worked in Japan. But then I decided I had to go check it out, so I started my quest for Tokyo's sexual cultures a couple of weeks ago. I was aided by Shu Lea Cheang and Aky Narita, a bondage performer and old friend of Artporn Amsterdam, who introduced me to artist and porn producers. Here again, I became very interested in the interplay between erotic magazine (manga) and videos/game (anime) images, and how artists would rework them. I noticed that women in particular had a very interesting way of playing with and subverting cartoon culture. For instance, Minori Kitahara who owns a sex shop for women in the backroom of her apartment, designs very unusual dildo's as well as feminist cartoons that are attractive to young women (and men I suppose). So this is one example of a unique peepzone for my research, as the sexual communities which emerge around Minori's store are not ghettoised nor are they as publicly visible and politically active as they are in western cultures. They have a very subtle way of checking out the myriad Japanese porn cultures 'with a twisted mind', stealing bits and pieces of information and presenting it as a new kind of attraction. So it is much more difficult to make a distinction between commercial and underground porn. The same holds for the movie I.K.U. that in my opinion contains many moments of witty commentary on commercial live and animated porn. However, in order to notice and appreciate such work as subversion, one has to almost be a Japanese porn or anime aficionado. Furthermore, anime movies have a unique way of blending action and sex scenes that makes it hard to classify them as 'porn' or 'not porn'. Then recently at Melbourne's International Film Festival, I saw _Tokyo Bound_, a new documentary by Susan Lambert about a mistresses working in Tokyo. Just as popular striptease shows in Tokyo present mythic scenes with live girls being attacked by ghosts and monsters, _Tokyo Bound_ showed a scene in which the mistresses were dressed up like a lobster and a mosquito, voraciously wrestling each other. This is a coming to life of anime scenes. They are hard to frame in terms of political or queer identity, but it does remind me of some early avant-garde art such as Apollinaire's play the _Breasts of Tiresias_. And even in early 20th century France there must have been a commercial cabaret or erotic culture that directly inspired the Avant-Garde. It's just so dead right now in the streets of Melbourne, Boston, Brussels, Amsterdam, New York, where porn art is uncomfortably ghettoised within art institutions or feminist and queer activist institutions. Younger generations especially seem to have lost their interest in these institutions. I am looking at Japan as an example of a lively sexual universe, a good place for women's activism, knowing that a lot of the commercial porn relies on a strict division of gender roles that really pisses off Japanese women. NR: Your next stop has been Australia. You began research on Internet censorship issues when you were working here for a couple of years in the late nineties. How, if at all, is your performance in Perth articulating with that aspect of your academic research (and perhaps before you respond to this, you can tell us something about the Perth performance/installation)? Libidot: I once used to live and work in Perth and felt very alienated from the rest of society. But sometimes such difficult periods in one's life lead to epiphanies. I felt so cut off from the rest of the world that I started to work more confidently on Internet pornography. Unlike some uncomfortable 'porn dialogues' with feminist and lesbian scholars I experienced in the USA, a growing institutional approval and geek existence led me into the direction of porn. I also started feeling more free as a scholar to use different mediums of expression for my ideas, as Australia has much more tolerance for such audio-visual and performative research. This gave me a lot of courage for my work, but I could not maintain my intellectual relationship with Perth without getting totally depressed. So I moved in 1999 and then recently returned to Perth and Australia to do research for my book. I arrived in Perth and put up an installation piece in the heritage listed Moore's Building. The installation invited viewers to go online and watch porn, print out images and turn them into flowers. The flowers look like paper trash coming out of the printer and filling up the room. This was a way of kicking off my search for pornographers in Australia, the piece Libidot and _Bubblejet 2001 SXY Flowers_ presented commercial porn and was very open to the audience's desire or interest to look at screen porn, the porn flowers, or add some of their own concepts. Now I am talking to several artists, performers, sex worker's organizations and sex shop owners in Sydney and Melbourne. I have interviewed several artists and curators who followed the Australian cyberarts boom very closely and are now trying to find out where it is going to go next: Linda Dement, Linda Wallace, Virginia Barrett, Sarah Waterson, Ian Haig, and many others. In Melbourne I tried out a few venues from within the sex industry, but I haven't found anything that stimulates me. I went to an SM play-party and did enjoy talking to an older 'master' who was very keen on introducing me to stimulation through electro-magnetic waves. He showed me his 'violent wand,' a seventy-year old hospital kit that supposedly was used on cancer patients, and is something he now uses in dungeons to administer little shocks. What I liked about his wand was that it produced beautiful little fluorescent bolts of light - pink, green and violet - when held closely to the skin. I was also fortunate enough to meet with J.D. Ryan of Downunder Toys, a vibrator/dildo manufacturer who has come up with a new line of women-friendly vibrators. Some of them are shaped after native animals such as the koala or platypus, and they are much smaller than those designed by men. Is this a revolution? Is this a joke? In my view, the vibrators are like curious little artworks and possibly some of the best conceived designs on the market, as J.D. Ryan strongly believes in online consumerism as a creative feminist mode of production. Since many artists are also working as teachers, I ended up talking a lot about teaching digital arts to younger generations of students. Several developments are complicating this issue; first of all is the fact that younger people are no longer excited to learn through the written word. Secondly, the collapse of liberal areas of study such as feminism, gender studies, queer studies. Thirdly, the collapse of dotcom economy. I personally believe that a study of pornography, sexuality and technology could be introduced in a fascinating way, but there seems to be a drift towards classical and safer fields of study. I have been able to pull together some of the strands of my research in a webdiary. I post a message and a picture about my work in progress every day. This work mode then forces at least some structure on the project and is also accessible to non-academics. NR: What sort of reaction have you had from your university with this project, particularly senior faculty and your immediate colleagues? Have you had to frame the project in such a way that makes it fit into target research areas - I'm thinking about funding issues here, and how those projects that attract funds within university settings, typically, are ones that articulate with the political economy of research? How receptive is your university to funding and supporting research projects of a creative nature that do not fit the usual categories of academic publishing? Libidot: Emerson College has been very supportive of my work, even though it involves a lot of sexually explicit materials, often produced by myself, and non-typical modes of academic production. They did know about this aspect of my work when they hired me and have not stopped me from thinking through the experimental nature of the work. I have also started to deliver academic papers in performative fashion with the help of my colleague, digital sound designer Maurice Methot. We select a piece of writing, which is then randomly sampled and mixed in with images and sounds. Maurice and I did a presentation at Emerson College called 'pornography and indeterminacy'. It was like an awkward jam-the-mind session and was received with bewilderment. Several senior faculty members and administrators were in the audience and they did not discard it completely. After giving such a presentation, the audience who until then had been observing conventional conference presentations (mostly read aloud from a piece of paper) became confused over what constitutes an effective mode of delivery. Of course I still have to produce and deliver all the standard publications as well in order to create a space to be an obscene or whatever scholar. It is a parallel existence, where the experimental work is more risky, more challenging and takes up more of the time. I now know that I cannot proceed academically without this kind of experimental-performative work any more. My own mental sanity is at stake! NR: How do you see this project developing? I will be developing the libidot website. First of all (an idea borrowed from Geert Lovink) I want to use the site to write and publish several chapters of my forthcoming 'Peepzones' book, not only to maintain a mechanism that will hopefully inspire me to write regularly but also to develop a number of unconventional writing styles and topics. The book is in progress, and I am trying to find a less academic writing style that is open to young generations. Secondly, I hope to start up a sexuality and technology forum, where writers and artists from different cultures can post their work and enter discussion. At this moment it has been possible for people to read the webdiary, post messages and submit work, but I have to think about an adequate and low maintenance design for benign, obscene doctors to look at other people's work. I am sure that Brian the Brain will be looking over my shoulder. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold