Ivo Skoric on Wed, 3 Oct 2001 21:53:02 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Bulldoze a wall over them. |
Another helpful hint - just in from Taliban: Non-Muslims must wear yellow patches to help the faithful avoid them. hmmm, I remember we've seen those yellow patches on people somewhere earlier in the last century. it didn't end up too well. Plus, given that the Taliban law prohibits practically any human activity save for prayer and punishment (even KITES of all things are forbidden), and thinking how they treat women (and men) of ordinary disposition, I wondered what happens to homosexuals. I mean, I was pretty sure that such a dire offense would be punished by death, but since so many other things are punished by death, there must have been something 'original' reserved for gays - there is no other fun that coming up with new and imaginative ways of torture and killing under Taliban, anyway - an on-line Economist article proved me right - there was a worthy 'intelectual' debate over that issue among the 'seekers of knowledge': "Taliban theorists have debated whether the proper punishment for homosexuals is to bulldoze a wall over them or to bury them alive." Poor Pat Robertson, he looks like an amateur homophobic compared to them. This, here, looks like a must-read historic perspective on how Al Qaeda might be working: http://www.phinnweb.com/neuro/assassins.html Although this "terrorist" group was set in 11th century, it seems that those who 'harboured' it were actually fairly liberal for those times - quite unlike the Taliban of today - and in a way more advanced than their Western adversaries, who learned from them to establish their Templars and CIA-s later - again unlike this modern network, that seems to be formed in a reversal of roles. ivo _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold