[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Brzezinski: Taliban made in U.S.A.

[Ian andrews <i.andrews@metroscreen.com.au>]

Very interesting interview.  Its quite likely that the CIA provoked the
USSR into the war, but I really think that the Afghanistan war had very
little effect on the collapse of the Soviet Union. I think it pales into
insignificance next to the efforts of COCOM (CIA) to destabilize the Soviet
economy and bankroll the Russian Mafia with hard currency, or even the
internal effects of Perestroika.

>[the interview is just so brilliant compact, I didn另 want you to miss]
>
>http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm
>
>Ex-National Security Chief Brzezinski admits: Afghan Islamism Was Made in
>Washington
>
>Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National
>Security Adviser in 'Le Nouvel Observateur' (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p.
>76
>
>Translated by Bill Blum
>
>***
>
>A couple of thoughts about the Brzezinski interview below. First, it flatly
>contradicts the common justification for U.S. actions in Afghanistan during
>the 1980s: that the U.S. simply aided forces resisting Soviet imperialism.
>Brzezinski makes clear that the Soviets were baited into sending forces to
>Afghanistan; thus their actions were defensive. Moreover, the U.S. used the
>violent Wahhabi (Saudi Arabian) form of Islam to create a monster-movement
>which plagues the world today. For more on this, see 'Articles Documenting
>U.S. Creation of Taliban and bin Laden's Terrorist Network' at
>http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm
>
>A reader wrote: "Similarly just because Brzezinski (among others) likes to
>claim that he personally overthrew the Soviet Union doesn't mean that you
>or the rest of us have to take him seriously. Nobody in 1979 had any reason
>to think that the Afghan war would bring down the USSR. Nor have we any
>real reason to think that it did bring it down."
>
>The point is well taken at least as regards Brzezinski's claim that his
>Afghan strategy destroyed the Soviet Union. But the issue here is a
>different one: what role did the U.S. government play in the creation of
>Islamist terrorism? In that regard, Brzezinski's assertion that the U.S.
>provoked Soviet actions and that Islamism was deliberately fostered is
>backed up by sources on all sides of the Afghan issue.
>
>Here's the interview.
>
>-- Emperor's Clothes
>
>***
>
>Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his
>memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to
>aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention.
>In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter.
>You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
>
>Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to
>the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army
>invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until
>now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President
>Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the
>pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the
>president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going
>to induce a Soviet military intervention.
>
>Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But
>perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to
>provoke it?
>
>B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we
>knowingly increased the probability that they would.
>
>Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they
>intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in
>Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of
>truth. You don't regret anything today?
>
>B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the
>effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to
>regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote
>to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its
>Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war
>unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the
>demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
>
>Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism,
>having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
>
>B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the
>collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of
>Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
>
>Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic
>fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
>
>B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to
>Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a
>rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading
>religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in
>common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan
>militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more
>than what unites the Christian countries.
>
>***
>
>Note: There are at least two editions of 'Le Nouvel Observateur.' With
>apparently the sole exception of the Library of Congress, the version sent
>to the United States is shorter than the French version. The Brzezinski
>interview was not included in the shorter version. *
>
>Translated from the French by Bill Blum, author of "Killing Hope: US
>Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II" and "Rogue State: A
>Guide to the World's Only Superpower" Portions of the books can be read at:
>http://members.aol.com/superogue/homepage.htm
>
>
>
>#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
>#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
>#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
>#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
>#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net


Ian Andrews
Metro Screen
Sydney


Email: i.andrews@metroscreen.com.au
http://www.metroscreen.com.au
1981 - 2001 Metro Screen is a celebrating 20 years of access and
innovation in independent screen production.

Metro Screen
Sydney Film Centre
Paddington Town Hall
P.O. Box 299
Paddington NSW 2021
Ph : 612 9361 5318
Fax: 612 9361 5320



_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold