integer on Tue, 23 Oct 2001 00:40:02 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] filthy nematodes |
>A Non-Western Voice > > By Irina Malenko open handz. kloze handz. + nn accuses the crocodile common murderers geert lovink. andreas broeckmann + extra okzident mafia psychopaths of systematic crimes against humanity. western imperialism. colonialism. korporat.fascism. filthy nematodes. vr!!endel!jk.nn > > "Non-Westerners of the world, unite!" > Since the 11th of September events in America the media are full of > condemnation and condolences. > What I had hoped them to be full of, was the simple question: "Why?" > Because without asking this question the world is going nowhere. > What I feel after the 11th of September here in Ireland, is exclusion >and > discrimination. No, I am not a Muslim and I do not look much different >from > the Irish people. And yet, there is an invisible division line, sadly, > created by the majority of the Irish people, perhaps, even not >realizing >it. > It is their division between "us" and "them", "non-Westerners", on >behalf >of > the "civilized" West. > They demand - yes, demand!- us to grief for the Western innocent >victims > while themselves, they didn't have a single SECOND of silence for > non-Western innocent victims of the Western governments who were and >still > are being murdered "in the name of democracy and freedom". > If you don't bow to this demand of compulsory extra-grief - and I >refuse to > grief more for one sort of the victims than for another!- you are >labeled >as > "uncivilized" or even "terrorist". > Can you imagine Iraqis or Yugoslavs demanding from Westerners to grief >for > their loved ones? Even though they have undoubtedly more moral rights >to do > so. > I can't. That must be a prerogative of "civilized" nations! > Where were you with your "civilization" when your own governments in >cold > blood murdered Iraqi and Yugoslav children? Where were others of you >when > your governments were applauding to these killings? > I feel sick to my stomach watching oh so many times how Bill Clinton >who >can > never wash off his hands all the innocent blood that he has shed around >the > world in his 8 years in the office, was cheered and greeted in Ireland >as > "The Peacemaker". > Let's face it: our, non-Western victims, do not count for the majority >of > you. You don't even like us to say how we feel about it. We are >supposed to > mourn only your deaths. > If they do count - and I mean not just for the small groups of >courageous > Westerners who are raising their voice against the current barbarity of >the > "civilized" world, but for all those Irish people who had their 3 >minutes >of > silence on Friday, 14.09- , if they do, where are you now, when even >more > innocent HUMAN BEINGS are being slaughtered? Simply because they were > "unlucky" to be born outside of your "civilization". > With all its beautiful talks against racism (even though Durban has >pretty > much shown to the world who is who on this issue!), the West divides >nations > into categories even after death. It invented 2 sorts of victims. Did > anybody notice that, apparently, there is the 1st class victims: those >from > the rich countries who deserve minutes of silence, mourning days, >candle > light vigils, tears and millions in solidarity donations - and then >there >is > 2nd class, "the rest of us", - "the collateral damage", as they nicely >and > civilized put it here. > What I am about to say, is not going to make me very popular here. But >my > pain and my dismay at the double standards of the Western general >public, > are too strong and it hurts too much to continue to keep quiet. > Ashes of the "collateral damage" of your civilization are knocking into >my > heart. > It is apparently "OK" to kill the innocent "in the name of democracy >and > freedom". It is "OK" to kill the children of one nation "in the name of > human rights" for another. Is that what your "civilization" is about? > People of Afghanistan now are yet another "collateral damage" to the >most >of > you. Just like in 1999 during NATO aggression against Yugoslavia *(if >you > still remember it!), now we are being told the same fairy tales - that >this > is "not the war against the Afghani (Yugoslav) people, but against >terrorism > (president Milosevic)". > Whom do they hope to fool? It is the people, not the leaders, who are >dying > daily. Just as the terrorist acts in America weren't "the war on the > American people", but on their leaders' policy - yet, those leaders are > still alive and kicking, while nearly 6000 civilians have vanished. > Where is the difference? > The difference is in the Western public opinion on different values of > different nations' human lives. > I can only imagine how furious not just the media, but the ordinary >citizens > here would be if anybody would have called the American 11th of >September > victims "collateral damage" in the global fight against Western >domination > and Western state terrorism. > American terrorist Timothy McVeigh has used the term "collateral >damage" >for > his own American victims and was immediately condemned by the outraged > Americans: how dared he, a private terrorist, to compare his American > victims with some "uncivilized" non-Western victims of his state > counterpart? > TO SUGGEST THAT NOT ALL HUMAN LIVES ARE OF THE SAME >VALUE, IS NAKED RACISM. > Yet, the Western governments and media are not just suggesting it: this >is > their preconception of the world. It is clear as daylight from the >actions - > no matter what they say. This is an axiom for them, something that >doesn't > even need a proof. That is why their own leaders whose true place is >the > cells of Scheveningen jail in Holland, in the defendants' box of the >Hague > tribunal, are still being cheered and greeted as "peacemakers". > After the 11th of September , when we are forced "to make a choice" : >either > to be with Mr. Bush and his understanding of freedom (that is, freedom >to > bomb any other nation, without any need for any international law, and >to > threaten anybody who disagrees) or else., I feel increasingly that I am >not > with the West on this one. > How can I be? I was just shown once again that myself and people like >me, > are not equal. That for far too many Irish people it is only "an >enormous > tragedy" if there are people of Irish origin among the victims (what >about > enormousness of the tragedy in Rwanda?!) > I am a non-Westerner here. It was not my choice to feel this way. Just >like > any human person, I felt a shock when I saw other human beings jumping >off > the skyscraper on the 11th of September. I felt pain for their families > because I know what it's like to lose somebody you love. Now, finally, > Americans as a nation feel that too. But what is their reaction? > The reason that I feel a stranger here now, was the choice of those who >have > no respect or compassion for the dead ones of other nations. For the >victims > of their own governments in other countries. > It was the choice of those who can throw McDonald's food that is left >over, > into the bin, cheerfully shouting: " This is for Ethiopia!" > We, non-Westerners, have less and less choice in this world, since the > continuing destruction of any decent alternative that we had, to "The > Western Way of life" that is being forcefully imposed on us in our home > countries. > What are our choices? Either to flee our homes and to come here, where >we > live so often in hostility while creating wealth for the West, or to >die > slowly from poverty, crime, sicknesses, diseases and oppression at >home, > under our own comprador governments, because of the debts they made to >the > same West, in order to pay for their own luxury lives. > Aha, there is also a new alternative now: to be bombed to pulp by a >deadly > mixture of ultra-expensive missiles and "humanitarian help" "in the >name of > civilization". "Civilized" nations need to restore their economy from > depression, you see, - and a war is the best way to do it.. > Let me tell you something. This is NOT "retaliation". > If it was right and just to "retaliate" this way for crimes against >humanity, the whole West should have been leveled to the ground by now. > What we are witnessing, is last century's imperialism on its way back - > under that brand-new smiling mask of "Civilization". Sadly, it seems >that > countries that weren't imperialist in the past and that are even now >still > partially colonized, are also joining this "crusade". > Retaliation? What retaliation? Remember, looking back at the part of >your > own history, which you refuse to recognize: we didn't start the fire! _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold