cpaul on Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:17:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Fw: CDR: RE: Fw: <nettime> New Scientist: Microwave Crowd Dispersal Tested (ADT) |
Begin forwarded message: Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:31:35 -0500 From: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@rsasecurity.com> To: "'cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com'" <cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com> Subject: CDR: RE: Fw: <nettime> New Scientist: Microwave Crowd Dispersal Tested (ADT) > > On Thursday, November 1, 2001, at 07:12 PM, cpaul wrote: > > > > > aluminum foil? > > > > http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/tech/heatison.jsp > > > > > > Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds > > > > i've been following the development of this skin heating > device for a while, and am keen to learn if there may be > an effective means to counter its use. > > the new scientist article suggests that the cornea is not > as resilient as skin when it comes to being bombarded with > microwaves, hence i seek opinions on how one might protect > oneself. Leather or wet clothes may shield most of the body. A wild guess to protect the eyes would be something that puts a transparent conductive material over them - mirror sunglasses, the mylar glasses used for eclipse observations (though you could not see anything else through them :-(), or the conductive, mostly transparent plastic material which is used to package static sensitive electronic components. Another possibility is to make goggles out of metal flyscreen - since the wavelength is 3mm, it's doubtful that they can penetrate. Chain mail would also work for the body. Peter _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold