Josephine Bosma on Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:09:01 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] bold and l


bolders,


As you might have noticed nettime-bold is not taken seriously at all by
the nettime moderators. If you look at the list archives you will see
that many if not most of the mails on nettime have never ever been on
bold. Nettime-bold, which was supposed to be the unmoderated version of
nettime, is simply used as nettime's trashcan. Of course the moderators
never really wanted an unmoderated version of nettime, and it took more
then two years of complaining about the way moderation was handled and
applied before bold was finally created at all. The situation at present
reeks of sabotage to me. My question to you is: do you think it makes
any sense to keep nettime bold if it shows hardly anything of nettime?
There are plenty of other unmoderated lists. Should we protest against
this ungoing stupidification of bold?



regards,


J
*

_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold