Karl-Erik Tallmo on Thu, 13 Dec 2001 06:35:28 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] At Twin and None |
It has been three months now, and I found this text from September on my computer: AT TWIN AND NONE Stocks, sports. Disasters. Catastrophes. Headlines had been big before. Suddenly it happens. The flames, the dust, the screams. And then yet another crash. The scale of it, the high fidelity of it, the threedimensionality of it, it's all there, "Jesus fucking Christ", human eyes panning towards the sky, camera eyes panning towards the sky, the smoke, the debris - soon televised. Again. And again and again and again. The sequel to earlier televised, photographed, cinematographed, fictionalized, factionalized, infomercialized, docudramatized versions. The first tower. The second tower. The first tower. The second tower. Again and again. Shown for days, and re-shown, trying to undo itself. And everybody is interviewed, people in the streets, prime ministers, people working in grocery stores in France, in grocery stores in Sweden - or Singapore: they all say, it was just like a movie. The highest degree of realism: the movie, the photograph, that devastating supremacy of simulacrum. "Independence Day" or "The Siege" or "Escape from New York", and we don't know if it is an explanation in retrospect, or, an inspiration for perpetrators. They all stand there, like shields of film strips or magnetic tapes, between the subjunctive and the indicative, and, I am ashamed to admit, even I, when looking at those repeatedly, and again, repeatedly televised images, those moving images of that airplane creeping through the unsuspecting, cerulean air, towards that adamantine facade, even I aestheticize, my hair on end, a loud howl in my ears, and still I aestheticize: the bright sunlight on the dust clouds, the sharp bluish brown shadows, that picture both smudged and clear at the same time, the color of the sky, the violence, it's like that painting by Turner, "Cottage Destroyed by an Avalanche". Or is it maybe "The Fighting Téméraire tugged to her last berth, to be broken up"? So crisp, like something by Richard Estes. And then there's Ballard. Crash. High-Rise. Atrocities. My heart crumples into a tiny ball of useless paper manuscripts, and again I hear "Jesus fucking Christ", a voice like from a prompter, trying to help me phrase - - something. And in the background I hear the speaker from the 1937 news-reel, when the Hindenburg took fire, the speaker's voice that has haunted me, ever since I heard it first, how the human eye was transformed by this new medium, the seer seeing on behalf of a nameless crowd, screaming out on behalf of who knows who: "Oh the humanity!" ... and he cries into the microphone. "Jesus fucking Christ" - is compassion still possible? What can one say. Or write. I wish I could ask the reader to tell what I have not yet written. That is truly what writing is about, being a link more hyper than anything, linking the write time with the read time. And maybe the teacher, who I suspect is rather strict, will not even find out we cheated. How could we ever - ? How can we - a happening as huge? Still there were millions, a few decades ago, you-all-now-what! And there were millions in olden days too, in medieval days, during antiquity. Sameness doesn't change - and neither does man. They say. So what remains for us with time and peace? I was just struggling with those eternal questions, those eternal questions that sometimes seem so uncalled-for: does God exist, is God really a good force, since people on this earth are starving and suffering, or is that His way of trying us all, asking us with a voice without sound but full of action: Are You Worthy You All? Then for the first time on this side of the Enlightenment we hear bearded disciples invoking the very deity I am trying to comprehend, as their leading star and commander - how sure they are, how doubtful I am, how frightening they are, and how they frighten me with their confidence, their confidence in my anticipated redeemer. Then I hear them, those petty voices talking in a very matter-of-fact tone about repression, imperialism and the Western way of life encapsulating its own punishment. I have only been to a ballgame once, but all of a sudden it seems as if I am back there. Every single move from one of the teams brings on unanimous cheers. Who are those people who tell me that my compassion is not genuine? That I am a hypocrite? They say I did not mourn when people died elsewhere. What do they know? No minutes of silence any of the other days when 20,000 children die, they say. Or for people dying because of bad housing, or no housing, or environmental poisons or safety neglect in the industry? Or for the plotted deaths of city planners, calculating some formula for the highest allowed death rate on certain highways? I shed tears every time people are eradicated by earthquakes, famine or bombs whether it be with the lot of Abraham or Ibrahim. What presumptuousness allows someone to deny me of my right to mourn my fellow men? I believe some scars, many scars, maybe most scars when you look at them more closely, go way beyond team-spirits or dogmatism. Some scars, maybe most scars, the deep scars inflicted into the very gut of us all, should move us all, should awake our compassion regardless. There are certainly minutes of mourning everywhere, years of mourning, decades. And maybe mass death of any kind, still, after all, somehow, goes beyond politics - not beyond insanity and fanaticism surely, but beyond politics? Earthquakes, floods, sinking ships, AIDS. Maybe there are personal sorrows and sorrows deep enough to touch our oldest parts, parts old enough maybe to even keep imprints of an amphibian subsistence of ours, and suddenly it is as if humanity itself had been struck by a huge blow, a boot in the ant-hill, a threat against our species, not just the Reaper calmly attending to his usual slow harvest, but suddenly getting some unexpected assistance of monstrous efficacy. But, when humans inflict wounds as big as that upon themselves, we are deeply affected by it, shocked, sickened, like when witnessing some poor soul deliberately, methodically, cutting himself or molesting himself. Yet healing is still possible. Is it not? © Karl-Erik Tallmo, December 11, 2001. -- _________________________________________________________________ KARL-ERIK TALLMO, Swedish writer, lecturer ARCHIVE: http://www.nisus.se/archive BOOK: http://www.nisus.se/gorgias ANOTHER BOOK: http://www.copyrighthistory.com MAGAZINE: http://art-bin.com _________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold