Bill Spornitz on Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:07:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> The Napsterisation of Everything |
At 1:18 AM +0000 11/28/01, richard barbrook wrote: >The Napsterisation of Everything: a review of John Alderman, Sonic Boom: >Napster, P2P and the battle for the future of music, Fourth Estate, London >2001. > >Richard Barbrook snip! >Unlike earlier forms of youthful rebellion, peer-to-peer computing is a >direct threat to the economics of the music industry. Despite the rapid >changes in musical tastes over the decades, the fundamentals of its >business structure have remained the same. Musicians are contracted to make >recordings. Music is sold on bits of plastic to consumers. Copyright laws >ensure that no one can distribute recordings without paying their owners. >Everyone supposedly benefits from this arrangement. Fans are offered a wide >choice of many different types of music. Musicians are able to earn a >living - and a few can become seriously rich. Small companies can survive >by selling niche styles of music. Large corporations can own profitable >music companies as part of their multi-media empires. Having recuperated >successive cultural revolutions, this business structure appeared >to >beimmutable. There's another side to this debate that is conveniently overlooked. Even the American Federation of Musicians (the *Union*) comes out strongly against file sharing, when it is not an understatement to say that the unauthorized reproduction of copyrighted musical works is an integral part of the multi-billion dollar live music industry. In the ten years or so I played in the live *scene* I must have played thousands of songs by other artists (what we call *covers*) without any effort to compensate copyright holders. It might be foolish of me to admit to this, except that I am joined in this activity by millions of fellow musicians. Indeed, a large percentage of these cases, band leaders insist that arrangement specifics like sax solos be copied exactly from the recordings. The song is a very powerful and efficient artifact. More than stopping file trading, what these people are trying to do is, essentially, defeat the overwhelming power of song. They will not succeed. b _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold