thomas soraperra on Tue, 22 Feb 2000 01:26:51 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> SILENCED. NEVER. |
Vienna, 16 Feb, 2000 SILENCED. NEVER. A week ago, curator Robert Fleck published a statement in the pages of the "Standard" daily newspaper in Vienna, where he expressed the opinion that "in a country where Nazis once again take a share in government responsibility, exhibitions can no longer take place." At the same time, he called for an "all-encompassing boycott of all Austrian cultural institutions." This comment provoked a multitude of public responses. Most participants in the debate vehemently contradicted Fleck, pointing out in particular that it would be gross stupidity in the present situation to give up liberal political positions in the arts without due resistance, as this would only encourage a "cultural hegemony" (Gramsci) of the Right. My own stance reflects a decided support for this position. It cannot be tolerated that we roll down the shutters and close up the "little shop of culture". On the contrary: It is essential especially in a polarized political situation like the present that institutions such as the Kunsthalle Wien assume an important role in society which requires of them an even more exacting way of working and a more precise aesthetic and political positioning. And it is thus that the attitude towards the arts and their institutions will become a crucial criterion of the social climate. Since the nineteen-eighties, the world has been represented, both in philosophy and art theory, as a carnival of masks or a simulacra of virtualities. We have even heard the "End of History" being pronounced. Now we have slipped back into the morass of history in a most unpleasant manner, finding ourselves once again confronted with a whole array of positions that express a hostility towards humanity (ranging from xenophobia, nationalism, hatred of the arts, to an absence of social justice). By no means akin to Lyotard's "immaterialities", these positions are solid, rough-and-ready demonstrations of a political will. A fundamental distrust towards any government with an FPO-participation is thus truly called for. And indeed, while the new government's inaugural declaration, when it came to the arts, merely rang up a handful of Old Faithfuls from its staple of non-committal phraseology - ("education, academic studies and culture form the foundations for our future...multiplicity and autonomy, openness and internationalism...etc") - in the end, it was a comment by the FPO's "philosophical mastermind", Andreas Mölzer, in the "Kronen-Zeitung" daily newspaper that made it plain which direction the winds would blow from in the future. Any criticism of the "black and blue" coalition, [so-called for its party colours], coming from those active in the arts, would henceforth be declared a "political witch-hunt against Austria", said Mölzer, while writers and artists, from Elfriede Jelinek to Valie Export, who dared articulate dissent, were accused of doing so from any number of self-interested motives. And never tiring of flogging a dead horse, Mölzer once again raised the hackneyed spectre of a society dominated by a "politically-correct, late-leftist zeitgeist, no matter how badly sucked dry and picked over it might be." Such infamous late “Stürmer" polemics create a climate, which right from the start stops any dialogue dead in its tracks. And Mölzer's pamphleteering merely reflects what community councils and political committees have been subjected to for years in terms of FPO-statements relating to the arts and artists ranging from the modernist Wiener Gruppe [Vienna Group] to the painter Cornelius Kolig. In 1998, just to give an example, the Kunsthalle Wien rejected the impudent and infamous demand of the FPÖ to remove the pictures of the exhibition “The Vienna Group" (“Die Wiener Gruppe") which the squeaky-clean brigade considered as "extraordinary filth". We did not allow the block leaders to dictate what is to be considered right for the Austrians' eyes and we will continue to do so. The response to all these aggressive declarations of pugnacity cannot be a mere retreat into boycott on the intellectual and artistic life which would only silence the voices that are now more important than ever. Instead, what is called for now is a keening of one's sensitivities towards the new strains dominating the public discourse. This includes a discriminating ear for the discrepancies between the soft soap of gubernatorial declarations, on the one hand, and the brassy reactionary practice of standing in the way of the arts and attacking deviant positions with a sledgehammer, on the other. That certainly is what all previous experience leads one to expect from this government in the near future. The arts will be a barometer, over the years to come, for measuring the political temperature in Austria. And in this role they will be an indispensable instrument for judging the social standards and the quality of public discourse. To characterize the attitude and effectiveness of the arts with a word of Samuel Beckett's, to whom the current exhibition at the Kunsthalle Wien is dedicated: "I shall never be silenced. Never." Gerald Matt, Director, Kunsthalle Wien Thomas Soraperra - public relations KUNSTHALLE WIEN Museumsplatz 1/6/1 A-1070 Vienna phone +43-1-52189-21 fax +43-1-52189-25 # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net