Brian Holmes on 2 Oct 2000 22:08:05 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> IMF/Yugoslavia |
To me, the article by Chossudovsky is absolutely pertinent to the Kosova and IMF threads. These are complex matters, but intellectuals should consider them before they begin repeating the positions of Blair, Clinton, and their local newspaper. An argument similar to Chussodovsky's appeared in 1999 in The New Left Review no. 234, "The NATO Powers and the Balkan Tragedy," by Peter Gowan. Catherine Samary has also worked on the role of the debt and its administration in ex-Yugoslavia, in her book "Yugoslavia Dismembered" (1994/95) and in various articles. Chossudovsky's subheadings on "Overhauling The Legal Framework," "The Bankruptcy Program," and "Shedding Surplus Workers" illustrate exactly what I meant in my September 16 post to nettime, when I said that the IMF, when it intervenes to reschedule debt, "uses its orthodox expertise to remodel the financial, juridical, and social relations of entire societies to favor intensified international exchange and competition." The competition also takes place between regions, such as the ex-Yugo republics, over the fruits and burdens of economic production. Mark Weisbrot, from the NGO "Center for Economic and Policy Research," has written: "The Fund, which has 182 member nations but is basically run by the US Treasury department, makes the major economic decisions for more than 50 countries... This makes the Fund the most powerful institution, of any kind, in the whole world, in terms of its influence over the lives of hundreds of millions of people-and indirectly, billions." (from "Globalization on the Ropes" available at: http://www.cepr.net/whatsnew.htm). That said, there is never one cause for historical events. I ran into Catherine Samary on the train back from Prague, and when we talked (inevitably) about structural adjustment in ex-Yugo, she pointed to a number of internal dynamics, both social and political, that had seriously weakened Yugoslav unity beginning in the seventies. The worst thing that could have been done to Yugoslavia in 1989-90, the thing guaranteed to cause violent disintegration, was to impose austerity measures on a country already beset by centrifugal tendencies. This is what the Fund and the other international financial institutions did. The amazing thing is that similar civil wars have not erupted in Russia, where the damage done by the IMF is greater yet. But unfortunately, this period of history is not yet behind us. Brian Holmes # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net