| nettime's_roving_reporter on 19 Oct 2000 01:50:31 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Feuerstein: I Don't Like Your Examples! |
<http://www.oreilly.com/news/feuerstein_1000.html>
Steven Feuerstein I Don't Like Your Examples!
by Steven Feuerstein, author of numerous O'Reilly Oracle books
11 October 2000
I have been writing books about the Oracle PL/SQL programming language
for the last five years. In 1999, O'Reilly published my fourth book,
Oracle PL/SQL Programming Guide to Oracle8i Features, which created a
bit of an uproar among my readership, caused considerable discussion
within O'Reilly, and led to my writing this article.
Why did this book cause a sensation? Consider this excerpt from
Chapter 2:
Let's look at a simple example. Suppose you are responsible for
building a database to keep track of war criminals for the
International Court of Justice. You create a package called wcpkg
to keep track of alleged war criminals. One of the programs in the
package registers a new criminal. You want that register program to
always save its changes, even if the calling program hasn't yet
issued a COMMIT. These characters are, after all, fairly slippery
and you don't want them to get away.
The package specification holds no surprises; the transaction type
is not evident here:
CREATE PACKAGE wcpkg AS
... PROCEDURE register (
culprit IN VARCHAR2, event IN VARCHAR2);
END wcpkg;
/
The package body, however, contains that new and wonderful pragma:
CREATE PACKAGE BODY wcpkg AS
...
PROCEDURE register (
culprit IN VARCHAR2, event IN VARCHAR2)
IS
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO war_criminal (name, activity)
VALUES (culprit, event);
COMMIT;
END;
END wcpkg;
/
And now when I call wcpkg.register, I am assured that my changes
have been duly recorded:
BEGIN
wcpkg.register ('Kissinger', 'Secret Bombing of Cambodia');
Now, I expect it's not every day you pick up a technology text and
read a charge that Henry Kissinger is a war criminal for the secret
bombing of Cambodia. The examples I used in this book, in fact, were
dramatically different from my earlier texts--and from just about any
technology book you can buy. Here are some of the other topics I
incorporated into my text:
* Excessive CEO compensation--and excessive, destructive layoffs
* Union-busting activities
* Positive role of unions in society
* Police brutality
* NATO bombing of civilian targets in Serbia
* Managed Care
* National Rifle Association and gun control
* The prison industry
* Slashing social programs to finance tax cuts
I did give my readers ample warning. Here is a section from the
preface titled "About the Examples."
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] It's not every day you pick up a technology text and
read...Henry Kissinger is a war criminal for the secret bombing of
Cambodia.
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
"I've been writing intensively about PL/SQL since 1994, and I have
a great time doing it. At the same time, I must admit that I have
simultaneously grown a little bit bored with using the same set of
examples again and again (yes, those infamous emp/employee and
dept/department tables), and I'm also very concerned about the
state of the world as we approach the end of the twentieth century.
Sure, things could be worse, but things could be a whole lot better
(with my examples and the world).
"Given these twin preoccupations, I have decided to offer examples
that are decidedly different from the usual. I'll be talking about
topics ranging from the state of health care in the United States
to the strength of the gun lobby, from wage structures to
environmental issues. I believe that even if you don't agree with
the positions I have on a particular issue, you will find that this
"breath of fresh air" approach will help you engage with the
technical material.
"I would also be very happy to hear from you--whether you agree or
disagree!--and I encourage you to visit my Web site, at
www.StevenFeuerstein.com, where you can read more about my life and
viewpoints and can get in touch."
How Fresh is That Air?
Though I thought these examples would be a "breath of fresh air," some
of my readers felt that the air stank. Here are some typical
responses:
Dear Mr. Feuerstein,
I, thankfully before buying the book, was able to peruse a copy of
your latest PL/SQL programming book. I think you have forgotten one
basic principle when you planned the examples. This was supposed to
be a book about PL/SQL, not blatant sociopolitical rantings. If I
had bought the book, I would be returning it immediately for a
complete refund. It doesn't matter whether I agreed or disagreed
with your views (in some cases I agreed, in some cases I strongly
disagreed). I found the examples so distracting that I was unable
to get the information I needed out of the book. Please in the
future, remember that we, the book buyers, are looking for
information about using PL/SQL. I am as tired of the emp and dept
tables as you are, but less distracting examples would have been
more appropriate.
Personally, I am no longer buying your books nor am I recommending
them to my clients as long as they contain the types of examples
you used in your latest books. I cannot, in good conscience,
recommend them as PL/SQL manuals because the examples removed the
books from that category.
I have to admit, getting emails like these has not been fun. Here's
another:
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] How often do you see real political debate, crossing
the entire spectrum, taking place?
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
I have just been shown a copy of the Guide to Oracle 8i Features
and to be quite honest am embarrassed on behalf of the O'Reilly
publishing company. It is well-known throughout the industry that
O'Reilly books are said to be the bibles for technical reference. I
am appalled at the liberty that Feuerstein has taken in imposing
his personal beliefs throughout the text and examples and am even
more appalled that O'Reilly allowed this kind of content to be
published. It is highly offensive regardless of freedom of speech
and Mr. Feuerstein's belief system and to choose such an unwilling
audience is absurd! I will not buy this book and will tell each and
every person I know in the industry to do the same. I will as well
be cautious when purchasing and or recommending any other O'Reilly
technical reference books. This is not the forum for this kind of
content!
You get the idea. Now, I should also mention that:
* I have received at least an equal amount of emails praising this
particular book, sometimes for the political content explicitly,
sometimes simply for the technical content, indicating that my
choice of examples was not problematic.
* O'Reilly & Associates reviewed the book's content and its lawyers
did recommend making a few changes. (They didn't, for example,
want me to explicitly and blatantly accuse a sitting governor of
bribery.)
* This book became a subject of active debate among O'Reilly editors
about what limits, if any, should be placed on an author's desire
to include possibly controversial examples.
* Tim O'Reilly and I talked about this subject at length and he
thought that it would make a great topic for public discussion. So
here I am!
All the negative--in some cases strongly negative--feedback I got sent
me back to the book to examine the content and ask myself some
questions: Was I wrong to include this content? Why is it so difficult
for people, especially those in the United States, to hear viewpoints
that make them uncomfortable? Would I be willing to put these kinds of
examples in my "bestseller," the foundation of my series, Oracle
PL/SQL Programming, and take a chance at putting off readers? Were my
examples full of opinions or facts? Can I really separate the two? And
what about the examples in all those other books (mine and the several
hundred other Oracle books, and thousands of other technical books)?
Are they all free of political content?
Democracy and Political Discourse
As I work on this article, I am flying back from a week's teaching in
the United Kingdom. As is usual when I spend time outside the United
States, and particularly in the U.K. (where I can understand the
language), I am struck by the open political discourse--and open
challenge--in the media and among individuals.
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] It is very difficult to talk politics in our
society--especially if your politics are anywhere to the left of
center.
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
It seems to me that one part of having a true and vibrant democracy is
the free flow of ideas and active debate among neighbors on the
crucial issues of our day. Does that go on around you? I sure don't
experience it in my neck of the woods. On the contrary, I find that,
in the United States, very few people are willing to talk "politics."
It is, along with the topic of money and sex, generally veered away
from in trepidation. Better to comment on the weather and sports.
Where would such an attitude come from? Much of any individual's
behavior in society is patterned after what she or he perceives to be
acceptable. Most of us do not want to stand out as different, and
certainly not as "troublemakers." What determines acceptability in our
society? To a large extent, the mass media.
Reflect on the television, radio, and print media reports you receive:
How often do you see real political debate, crossing the entire
spectrum, taking place? How often do you hear a member of the media
truly challenge politicians and business "leaders" to justify their
policies and actions? I believe that very little real debate ever
takes place and our journalists, especially the high-profile ones,
treat those in power with kid gloves. Sometimes it seems like there is
a debate going on (within a T.V. program like "Crossfire," for
example), but in fact that debate is missing/ignoring/silencing a
large swath of viewpoints: pretty much anything to the left of Bill
Clinton.
As a result, it is very difficult to talk politics in our
society--especially if your politics are anywhere to the left of
center. And it is almost impossible to present an informed,
sophisticated critique of the role of global capitalism in the world
today.
Now, you might well say to yourself, "Who cares?" You like global
capitalism. You don't think it's all that bad, or at least you don't
care if a few hundred million people are paid pennies for their labor.
And, well, you don't want to talk politics. That's fine. That's your
choice. But I also believe that almost every technology book we buy
and read is full of politics.
The Hidden and Prevailing Ideology
I believe that just about every technical book comes with a body of
politics, an ideology that governs and usually restricts its example
set. We don't notice the political slant because it reflects the
dominant viewpoint in our society and is thus invisible.
After reviewing many books, I feel comfortable in summarizing the vast
majority of texts as having these characteristics:
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] I don't see [the gain] from the unwritten but
rigorously followed rules that technical books must...support the
status quo in our society.
[dotclear.gif]
[dotclear.gif] [dotclear.gif]
* Business-centric: Most examples used in technology books focus on
how to make business work more efficiently, regardless of its
impact on human society and the world as a whole. As a result, we
constantly read about human-resource or personnel systems. And
while examples frequently touch on education, these applications
have more to do with managing students (the business side of
education) than with improving the quality of education those
students receive. All of this seems perfectly "natural" since the
vast majority of technology is used by businesses to make profits.
But does it have to be that way?
Consumer-oriented: Many, many examples promote the perspective that
the only reason we exist in this world is to buy things. Just
about every book about the Internet focuses on some aspect of
e-commerce, such as how to maximize the use of banner ads, how to
grab and hold eyeballs, how to present product information
dynamically.
In 1999 Addison-Wesley published a truly marvelous book titled
Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, by Martin
Fowler. In it, Martin offers a systematic method for improving the
quality of our code without affecting the interface to and
behavior of that code. To demonstrate his techniques, the author
offers a refreshing example: video rentals. Yet it still comes
down to commerce. We are what we buy, not what we think and do
with our lives outside of the exchange of items for money.
Humans as numbered entities: This is particularly true in
database-related books (including my own!). Technology is
presented through a medium of scenarios that represent--and
manipulate--humans as numbers. Just about any Oracle text you pick
up is dominated by "emp-dept" examples: a personnel application
that talks about salaries, bonuses, and commissions, when you were
hired, which department you belong to, the name of an employee
based on an employee_id, and so on. The message, so clearly
presented in this dominant theme, is that we are defined primarily
as workers and our value in life is derived from the contribution
we make to our employer.
Everything and anything as numbered entities: Hey, it's not just
people! Technical examples extend the quantification approach to
natural resources, information, entertainment, etc. Oracle also
offers a standard demonstration base of tables and data for a
sales/order entry system. This, of course, makes perfect sense in
the world of Oracle--driven by the obsessive personality of Larry
Ellison to sell, sell, sell software and services. (I own shares
of Oracle stock and have benefitted directly from Larry's
obsessions.)
There are exceptions. Scott Urman's latest book on PL/SQL,
Oracle8i Advanced PL/SQL Programming, uses a college registration
system as his example base. [Editor's Note: We tried linking to
Scott Urman's book on the McGraw-Hill Web site, but the nature of
their URLs made that impossible.] Although many American colleges
are overly focused on preparing young people for a life of
drudgery in one job or another (and corporations are
commercializing higher education to an alarming degree), I
congratulate Scott on taking a road less traveled.
Breathing Life Into Technical Books
I could go on and on, but I think you get the drift. The bottom line
for me is that books written about technology are written by human
beings with perspectives and beliefs. Some of us center our lives
around a particular technology or around the business applications of
that technology. Many of us see the technology as one part of a rich,
complex way of life--and dream of ways that this technology can
transform and improve human society and our planet. I don't see what
any of us gain--writers and readers alike--from the unwritten but
nonetheless rigorously followed rules that technical books must
conform to and further support the status quo in our society.
© 2000, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net