Jonathan Prince on 21 Oct 2000 08:41:11 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Palestinians as Myth |
By this logic, I could go to Italy, claim it as my own, tell all the current residents to either leave or live in special areas of my choosing, deny them basic human rights and so on. Italy only came into existence as 'Italy' in 1870 - a mere 130 years ago. Certain 130 years isn't enough to claim 'statehood', right? Those so called 'Italians' before were only from various cities and small towns. Tongue in cheek example, of course. What is a nation-state? What/who claims right to have one and so is an interesting question - but ultimately irrelevant. Should a state be based on ethnicity? Race? Religion? Genetics? Geography? or, as it most common, a series of lines drawn on a map to end a conflict or war? Palestinians are treated as second class humans, under occupation and against international law. The Israelis should know by now (and increasingly many do, now) that allowing a Palestinian State to exist is the only path to peace. Either that or secular democratic state for all. Israel should want a Palestinian state, if Israel wants peace. The question is how to get there without causing world war three. Whether or not 'Palestinians exist' or not - the reality is that Palestinians have more of a sense of nationalism and nationhood now, because of Israel's inhumane treatment of them, than they probably ever did before. If it is true that Palestinians did not exist before, they do now - because of the Israelis. my 2 cents, jonathan Some Italian history: http://www.state.gov/www/background_notes/italy_9910_bgn.html ''By the early 19th century, a nationalist movement developed and led to the reunification of Italy--except for Rome--in the 1860s. In 1861, Victor Emmanuel II of the House of Savoy was proclaimed King of Italy. Rome was incorporated in 1870.'' At 7:34 AM -0400 10/19/00, Douglas Rushkoff wrote: >Could this article from Worldnet Daily possibly be true? It's apparently >by an Arab-American journalist/commentator, whose columns are at >http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/20001011_xcbtl_myths_brmi.shtml > >---- >Myths of the >Middle East >Joseph Farah > >© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com > >[...] >The truth is that Palestine is no more real than Never-Never Land. The >first time the name was used was in 70 A.D. when the Romans committed >genocide against the Jews, smashed the Temple and declared the land of >Israel would be no more. From then on, the Romans promised, it would be >known as Palestine. The name was derived from the Philistines, a >Goliathian people conquered by the Jews centuries earlier. It was a way >for the Romans to add insult to injury. They also tried to change the name >of Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina, but that had even less staying power. <...> -- .. Jonathan Prince : No New jonathan@killyourtv.com : Oilgarchies http://KillYourTV.com : http://www.GWBushSucks.com ........................................................ 'Political language...is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.' - George Orwell # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net