geert lovink on 29 Dec 2000 21:32:28 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> "it'll be a particularly good year for bankruptcy lawyers and auctioneers" |
from: www.washingtonpost.com And a Happy New Economy To You! By Shannon Henry Thursday, December 28, 2000 Technology "incubators" became a bad word in 2000, "layoffs" a common one. The gleeful, easy, everyone-is-getting-funded attitude has been replaced by skepticism, gloom and massive reversals of fortune. People are still creating new companies and inventing technology. But stage one of Internet business is, well, so over. It's not that the "new economy" will cease to exist, it just isn't new anymore. "The jig is up," says Marc Andreessen, who co-founded Netscape, briefly went to work at America Online when it bought his company and then founded Loudcloud, the Sunnyvale, Calif., seller of Web software and services, "We are now in a time of great seriousness. It is much, much harder to build and grow a company than it has been in past years. This will be a tough year." I asked 15 or so well-connected people in the local tech community to talk about what trends, people and companies we should watch in 2001. Most are resoundingly pessimistic these days, opining that we haven't hit bottom yet and that the shakeout will continue until many companies' pockets are completely emptied. So much for a happy new year. Trends . Fewer companies will go public; fewer companies should. In January, Varsity Group of Washington is scheduled to be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market. The company, whose stock closed yesterday at 16 cents per share, didn't have proprietary technology, but did have an idea to market books and other products to college students. What's so bad about being a good private company? Or Varsity could have become a division of a larger company. It still could, of course -- it's quite a bargain these days. . Venture capitalists' stars are falling back to earth. When things were great and the money flowed, everyone wanted either to be a VC or be near a VC. Some of the most experienced venture firms, especially Baltimore-based New Enterprise Associates, which sits on a new pile of money and has unusual clout, will always be revered in tech and financial circles. But some of the newer funds will have trouble raising money and won't be able to invest in as many deals because their current companies are struggling. Some funds -- like the dogs they invested in -- will not only lose their rock star status but could even go out of business. . There will be fewer "Internet" companies but more advanced uses of technologies in all sorts of businesses. It will probably be a while until the Internet is as ubiquitous as electricity, but it's starting to become more of a utility to many. "The Internet won't be looked at as a stand-alone industry or business, but as a set of tools and technologies to allow for any company to become faster and stronger and more consumer-focused. . . . It will be like Cable News Network becoming CNN," says America Online executive Ted Leonsis. . Cash will be king. A start-up company's employees, suppliers and investors will be less interested in equity or stock options and more interested in real money. All those law firms and real estate companies that took equity in lieu of money aren't going to fall for that again. You can just see the old-economy partners at a legal practice saying "I told you so" to the new-economy ones who argued that they should take equity or deferred fees for dot-com clients. Andreessen says he's now thrilled that Loudcloud never took equity in its technology customers instead of dollars. "We'd have an equity portfolio that would be worthless," Andreessen says, if he'd gone that route. But he also says the best companies won't casually offer stakes in their companies anyway, because the business is more valuable to them than cash. . There will be more serial entrepreneurs. Despite the carnage, some people can't help but start companies again. And again. Those people -- whether they passionately love what they do or have something to prove, or both -- will always be hardest to beat. . Wireless Internet access on handheld devices is a perennial one-to-watch. This year enough people started carrying these things that Miss Manners will soon need to intervene with a dictum on proper social usage. Aether Systems of Owings Mills, Md., is our local big player in this field. People and Companies . Mark Warner. The Democrat is raising tech money from Democrats and Republicans alike for his bid for the Virginia governorship in 2001. If he wins, he'll be the first in his crowd to take public office. Reggie Aggarwal, chief executive of Cvent.com, says Warner's ability to span the worlds of technology, finance and politics -- and bring them all together -- may be a new model to follow. . Michael Saylor. His name kept coming up as an answer to "companies" to watch. Clearly people think of the chief executive as synonymous with the business of MicroStrategy, the Vienna data-mining company that recently settled a fraud lawsuit with the Securities and Exchange Commission. "Can he turn around MicroStrategy's bad-boy image with investors and the SEC, and convince people he's got a sound business model that can generate profits and strong growth?" asks Jonathan Shames, a partner at Ernst & Young who works with technology companies. Many others are wondering, too, and watching to see how WorldCom Vice Chairman John Sidgmore's role as chairman of Strategy.com, an online personal information subsidiary of MicroStrategy, will affect the company's future. . William Schrader. The chief executive of PSINet and one of Washington's Internet pioneers, he recently lost his stake in his own company -- which he'd put up as collateral for a $25 million personal loan -- when its share price fell below a certain point. It's a tragedy for Schrader, who had many chances to sell PSINet but refused them all. "Can he pull PSINet back from the brink?" asks April Young of Imperial Bank. Others wonder who will take over the company. Indeed, many said the people to watch in 2001 will, unfortunately, be on their way down. "No heroes this year," says Jack Biddle, general partner of venture-capital firm Novak Biddle. He predicts more high-visibility "flame-outs" to come. . The opportunists. Turnaround artists, image consultants and others who are jumping in to save troubled tech companies and capitalize on their pain. Many think it'll be a particularly good year for bankruptcy lawyers and auctioneers. . Companies ready to seize business opportunities created by the unraveling of the human genome. "Will 2001 result in actual product ideas or just more mapping?" wonders Northern Virginia Technology Council chairman and Draper Atlantic managing partner John Backus. . America Online. Has Washington lost its most powerful technology company to New York? The answer, of course, is yes. But more fundamentally, we should be wondering how the marriage of AOL and Time Warner (assuming it goes through as planned early in the new year) will affect the way we use the Internet. And that is entirely unpredictable. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net