b g on Thu, 19 Sep 2002 23:24:29 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> potentia ist scientia - state of the art is art of the state |
State of the Art is Art of the State We are indeed living in a privately funded renaissance of the arts, our powerful Northern nations have afforded us with their strong policies of techno-military control. We Rule! And we like it! Looking through the DARPA site I am impressed with the ambitious and innovative projects it has envisaged in its IAO mission and vision statements. We can see here that the next generation cellphones and pdas and new unimaginably more virally popular techno-life/cultural enhancements are born under just these (albeit slightly sinister) auspices. It has become clearer than ever before that the military fosters the most creative and innovative dynamism in the information age. They take a 'brute force' creative approach to every point on their agendas as they seek out and exploit the most virulent technologies for domination and control, opening up and abandoning vast new realms to be plumbed by commercial (and 'anti'-commercial) hackers in the private sector. Inevitably, these technologies become the state of the art in music, film and tv media industries. GWB's unprecedented five-year $2.3trillion military budget will make possible incredible advances in communications technology, especially in hardware and infrastructure from which we all 'benefit'. The same thing is happening in biotech aswell. Communication artists and academics like to feel we are on the cutting edge and we are we are on the cutting edge of articulating this grand new social resource our powerful military regimes have opened up for us. Our militaries have made us so rich that they can afford us our little idealistic democracy. Singapore's 'elder-statesman' Lee Kuan Yew advocates a two-system approach to national government. 'democracy' for the educated in the cities, autocracy for everyone else. On the global scale, we see that this system has been transposed: 'democracy' for us, "whatever will get the job done (to keep 'em producing for us)" for them. Celebrate it or denigrate it we legitimate our hegemony and why the hell not? Its up to the developing countries of the world to band together and develop credible militaries which would aggressively stake a claim for their people's cultural flourishing. Its time to acknowledge the intimate relationship between the military and the arts... distant wars (and random terrorist massacres at home) may be the unhappy sacrifice we have to endure to create at the height of our powers in our studios, labs and where we gather. We are all players in the war game. Hail to the chief! baruch gottlieb http://www.vociferous.org DARPA/IAO: http://www.darpa.mil/iao/ On Lee Kuan Yew: he backs GWB on indonesian anti-terrorist crackdown http://www.singapore-window.org/sw02/020226at.htm articulates limits of democracy http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/news/lee_kuan_yew.htm current Singaporean PRIME MINISTER GOH CHOK TONG, outlining the ideals of a thriving one country/two systems state: http://www.gov.sg/singov/announce/180802pm.htm # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net