<nettime> eyetime/netbeam digest [ebner, sugar, spornitz x2]

["nettime's_self-digestive_system" <nettime@bbs.thing.net>]

Re: <nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED
     "jorn.ebner@britishlibrary.net" <jorn.ebner@britishlibrary.net>
Re: quest to Nettime to be part of reDISTRIBUTED CREATIVITY
     Janos Sugar <sj@c3.hu>
Copyright Notice
     Bill Spornitz <spornitz@mts.net>
Copyleft Notice
     Bill Spornitz <spornitz@mts.net>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:58:47 +0100
Subject: Re: <nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED
	CREATIVITY online forum with Eyebeam
From: "jorn.ebner@britishlibrary.net" <jorn.ebner@britishlibrary.net>

maybe there could be a roving reporter reporting to eyebeam all the
interesting things that are being discussed at nettime during that special
month. there might be someone who gets all excited at eyebeam and will
report back to nettime all the great things that happen at eyebeam in
response to the nettime-mail, which might then be reported back to
eyebeamers. the snake biting its own tail. there could be a dedicated
'nettime-eye' list too, for all who want to read the reports.

j

> Von: christine park <powcp@yahoo.com>

> responsibility & privilege.  How you want to deal with
> eyebeam--via nettime--is up to you.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:36:03 +0200
From: Janos Sugar <sj@c3.hu>
Subject: Re: quest to Nettime to be part of reDISTRIBUTED CREATIVITY

   i agree
   
   cheers,
   
   j
   
   At 20:35 -0400 9/27/03, Alan Sondheim wrote:
   
     Just want to say all of this is some of the most interesting mail
     I've seen on nettime - I hope somewhere it gets republished - and in
     fact it's a collaboration in itself, a groupuscular/ chaotic response.
   
   At 11:59 -0400 9/28/03, Timothy Druckrey wrote:
   
     Can one imagine a less coherent understanding of what nettime is?
     I'd strongly suggest rejecting Eyebeam's invitation.
     
   At 21:33:56 -0400 9/28/03, Robbin Murphy wrote:
   
     Seems to me that nettime is better suited to being a subject of the
     forum than a defined community participant. What Beth and Eyebeam
     may be looking for might be better represented by The Thing,

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:59:28 -0500
From: Bill Spornitz <spornitz@mts.net>
Subject: Copyright Notice

DISTRIBUTED CREATIVITY copyright nettime 0 3

b

>Re: <nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED CREATIVITY <...>
>      "Shaun Rolph" <shaun@palefire.fsnet.co.uk>
>"tobias c. van Veen" <tobias@techno.ca>
>      Re: <nettime> Re: Community, what is it, and Nettime
 <...>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:00:34 -0500
From: Bill Spornitz <spornitz@mts.net>
Subject: Copyleft Notice

DISTRIBUTED CREATIVITY copyleft nettime 0 3

b

>Re: <nettime> Request to Nettime to be part of DISTRIBUTED CREATIVITY <...>
>      "Shaun Rolph" <shaun@palefire.fsnet.co.uk>
>"tobias c. van Veen" <tobias@techno.ca>
>      Re: <nettime> Re: Community, what is it, and Nettime
 <...>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net