Heiko Recktenwald on Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:37:13 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> What's the meaning of "non-commercial"? |
Hi, On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Florian Cramer wrote: > Am Dienstag, 04. Januar 2005 um 22:43:41 Uhr (+0100) schrieb rasmus > fleischer: > > > Personally, I'm astonished that so many people (including a large part > > of the net's "copyfighters", and many nettimers too) by default put > > NonCommercial-licenses on every line of text they produce -- seemingly > > without a thought on what consequenses such that license may bring. > > Yes, few people are aware that imposing the "non-commercial" restriction > on a licensed work makes it non-free in terms of the Free Software and > Open Source movements. The Free Software definition of the FSF/GNU But this doesnt matter at all! See also the dual licencing model proposed by Arpad Gereoffy for mplayer, H. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net