Patrice Riemens on Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:23:42 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> On the Internet download imbroglio in France... |
The legislative tribulations of the copyright online finally made it to the front page of the newspapers in France yesterday. Parliament, irate at the government's haste in pushing a botched law proposal through its throat in an emergency procedure just before the Christmas break, adopted an amendment making _private_ downloading of pictures and music by and large legit. Shocked, PM de Villepin chose to postpone the whole proposal till after the holiday, even at the expense of ridiculing his minister of culture. Some in foreign parts have already hailed a breaktrough and portrayed France as shining example of liberal legislative thinking. This enthusiasm might be very premature. First the amendment is very likely to be withdrawn when the proposal comes up for discussian again. But mostly, it ignores two fundamentals in the French political and cultural appreciation of the whole issue of copyright. The first is the widely discussed, though less widely well-understood, French 'particularity' about copyright, significantly known in French as 'droit d'auteur' (authors right). A somewhat simplistic ("rien n'est simple" said Sempe in a famous cartooon serie) depiction would define 'droit d'auteur' as a moral right first, a commercial one second (likewise, copyright would be defined as foremost of even exclusively commercial). This has arosen the impression that French 'copyright' could be somehow more accomodative to 'sharing' and other less profit oriented formats, while at the same time protecting the genuine interests of creators beter. Reality, alas, is almost the exact opposite, as commercial interests (read: producers and other intermediaries) have hijacked the moral high ground and are defending their monolpoly rents even more vociferously than in the Anglo-Saxon world. And with success up to now, to witt the harsh penalties that have rained down on individual 'transgressors', and their 'helpers', especially ISPs. Strongly, but subtly linked to this, is a second, much less (afaik) well-known factor: the institutionaly ingrained aversion of French culture for 'free' - as in 'beer'. Bizarely enough for a nation almost daily bashed in the columns of the Wall Street Journal as economically retrograde and capitalism feindish, France has a worship of the remuneration for next to everything under the sun. It is not only that "tout travail merite salaire" (each labor merits a fee) but the citizen is also expected to affirm her status by demonstrating willingness and ability to pay at all time (one can be arrested for vagrancy for want of sufficient cash in the pocket). Profit here is not the point - even when recovery costs exceed receipts gratuity is strongly rejected. This aversion for what is automatically considered undeserved freebies and its unreconstructed wordhip of the individual (but practically non-existant), 'moral', author, make France largely impervious - and hostile - to the increasingly global discourse about 'commons' (creative or otherwise), and a likely candidate for the most restrictive and oppressive legislation with regard to electronic copyright and 'defense' of 'intellectual property' in general. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net