sam de silva on Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:34:06 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> microsoft, cutlets and the media |
*Microsoft, Cutlets and the Media* by Sam de Silva - 12 April 2006 Last Wednesday, I was in a room in the basement of the Hilton to witness the launch of a partnership between Microsoft and local Sri Lankan tech/media NGO - InfoShare. Microsoft presented InfoShare with a big cheque for 16.5 million rupees - an amount that would buy a two bedroom apartment with an ordinary view in downtown Colombo - to develop the IT sector in the rural areas of Sri Lanka. Microsoft's plan is to "empower under-served people with new skills for better employability" and they want InfoShare to "touch the lives of over 35,000 individuals" with "IT capacity building exercises". But this story isn't about Microsoft or their community empowerment strategies. I have no doubt InfoShare will use the money wisely. They won't create a Sri Lanka whose people, addicted to Microsoft products, end up employed in data entry sweat shops in free trade zones. What InfoShare will do is create a technology-aware rural population who can think for themselves. The end result will be smart, diverse and vibrant knowledge societies across non-urban Sri Lanka. What this story is about is the media, and cutlets for cameras, comments and column inches. Earlier last week, a day before the Hilton event, I spent a couple of hours with a small organization that was involved in developing some interesting projects around bridging ethnic divisions. I asked them why stories about their activities weren't appearing in the papers. Their response shocked me. They told me they didn't have the money to pay journalists - to pay for the cutlets that would attract the journalists. The seriousness of what they were saying didn't strike me until I attended the Microsoft event. The launch at the Hilton had lots of cutlets, lots of pastries, lots of meat on sticks, lots of fruit, lots of cake and lots of booze. Of course all the cameras would turn up. I suppose the fact that one of the richest and most powerful companies in the world is investing 16.5 million rupees (US$165,000) over a 2 year period in rural Sri Lanka to "touch the lives of over 35,000 individuals" makes an interesting story. But so is the story, the many stories, about the work done by small groups that will help change Sri Lanka from an island that's on the edge of war, to a land that can be at peace. I have to acknowledge I haven't lived in Sri Lanka for a long period of time. I am very much an outsider. And I am sure journalists have covered many stories about the peace building work and the issues surrounding conflict. But it still troubles me to hear someone say they can't get the interest of journalists unless they tempt them with food and drink. Sure, I am familiar with the role of the public relations agencies. What happened at the Hilton isn't a crime - it's common business sense. What is a crime though, is the ease with which journalists and editors can be seduced, and the need, it seems, to seduce them in order to get a story covered. Let's be honest here. The offering of cutlets in this context goes beyond Sri Lankan hospitality! It is effectively envelope journalism - the exchange of cash for comment. And of course, it is not something that's unique to Sri Lanka - it is happening everywhere. Journalists all over the world are easily seduced to become reproducers of press releases and messages dictated by public relations agencies. Robert Fisk is my current hero. He's a war correspondent who's been covering the Middle East for almost 30 years. I am reading his latest book titled 'The Great War for Civilisation - The Conquest of the Middle East'. It's a great read and will be of interest to people following Sri Lanka's conflict and anyone interested in the reporting of stories about the Middle East. As well as first-hand reporting from the area, Fisk highlights examples of sloppy journalism, of reporters regurgitating what military public relations officers says word for word without question. The reason I mention Robert Fisk is because of Amira Hass. In his book, Fisk relates his interactions with her, an Israeli who lives in Ramallah.. Fisk writes: "Her column in Ha'aretz blazes with indignation at the way her own country, Israel, is mistreating and killing the Palestinians". But what I want to convey is Hass's take on the role of a journalist. She tells Fisk that "What journalism is really about - it's to monitor power and the centres of power". That is the clearest definition of a journalist I have heard to date - someone who monitors power and the centres of power. The way the media is manipulated by public relations agencies is nothing compared to the way political happenings are covered. When it comes to politics, and monitoring those centres of power, it's the journalists, editors and media proprietors who seem to be doing the seducing, offering cutlets and plenty of column inches to those at the top. Again, this is not unique to Sri Lanka - it happens everywhere, and Fisk's book documents it. I am not saying journalists should not accept the food and drink offers. Go ahead - eat the cutlets, drink the booze. But also interrogate the story thoroughly. Maintain integrity as a journalist and independent thinker. Investigate power and consider the stories of people who can't afford to cover a table with cutlets and booze. So why is Microsoft giving 16.5 million rupees for IT development in rural Sri Lanka? Maybe someone else will have to give a response. I promised this story wouldn't be about Microsoft! /This story was written using Microsoft Word running on a Mac OS-X platform. / # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net