Stevphen Shukaitis on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:19:18 -0400 (EDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Imaginal Machines, Movements, and Academic Enclosures NYC 4/1 |
Imaginal Machines, Movements, and Academic Enclosures Wednesday April 1st, 2009, 7PM 16Beaver Street, New York The defense of a PhD dissertation is a strange moment, one where what often starts as a collective process of the inquiry and the social production of knowledge is enclosed by the legitimating apparatuses of the academy. Something is gained for the individual upon whom a mark of academic is granted (PhD from the Latin philosophi? doctor, or literally the status as a ?teacher of philosophy?), but also something is lost within that process: the individual benefits, but often to the neglect of the flows of social and collective creativity from which their work draws. This is perhaps especially the case in forms of research and inquiry based around describing and theorizing political organizing, social movements, and radical politics. While searching out authentic moments of political discourse is often valued as a moment of data collection, the idea that there might be a role for more participatory forms of the evaluation of research and findings, role which goes beyond movements as data and breaks down the positions of researching-subject and researched-objects, is looked on with much greater skepticism, if not outright dismissal. But what if it was otherwise? What if rather than a moment of professionalizing enclosure of knowledge, it was made into a moment for collective reflection and celebration of the collective creativity from which research draws? This would perhaps be to harken back to the origins of the doctoral degree as the ijazat attadris wa ?l-iftta (?license to teach and issue legal opinions?) in the training of Islamic law, but rather with the difference that guiding focus is not the formation and constitution of the law, but rather the constituent processes that guide and continually compose social movements. We invite you to join Stevphen Shukaitis, Silvia Federici, and George Caffentzis in a discussion and forum that will tentatively sketch out what such a process might be through enacting it. Stevphen will discuss his research on collective imagination, class composition, and processes of social movement, which George and Silvia will comment on, leading to a collective discussion and reflection, both on the research presented and the processes of academic legitimation in relation to politically engaged social research. Electronic copies of Stevphen?s research will be made available via this site: http://stevphen.mahost.org/academicenclosures.html. For more information http://www.16beavergroup.org Stevphen Shukaitis is a lecturer at the University of Essex and a member of the Autonomedia editorial collective. He is the editor (with Erika Biddle and David Graeber) of Constituent Imagination: Militant Investigations // Collective Theorization (AK Press, 2007). His research focuses on the emergence of collective imagination in social movements and the changing compositions of cultural and artistic labor. For more on his work and writing, see http://stevphen.mahost.org. Silvia Federici is a scholar, activist, and professor emerita at Hofstra University. She is the author of Caliban and the Witch: Women the Body and Primitive Accumulation (Autonomedia, 2004) and is the co- founder of the Committee for Academic Freedom in Africa. George Caffentzis is a member of the Midnight Notes Collective and coordinator of the committee for Academic Freedom in Africa. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org