David Mandl on Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:59:53 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Wikileaks and Protocol |
On Dec 19, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Rory Solomon wrote: > To end with a humorous counter-example, did anyone follow this recent > drama around NY Times, Google, and Vitaly Borker? > > http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/being-bad-to-your-customers-is- > bad-for.html Basically, the New York Times reported on a Brooklyn > ecommerce eyeglass merchant who got high google search results > by being a jerk. Few days later, google publishes that blog post > explaining how upset the article made them and how they re-worked > their search algorithm(!) to exclude Borker and people like him. The hilarious thing about that official statement was the fact that Google claimed the business owner in question--who, remember, terrorized and implicitly threatened the life of his customer--"provides an extremely poor user experience." When the only language you have is a hammer, every situation looks like a nail. --Dave. -- Dave Mandl dmandl@panix.com davem@wfmu.org Web: http://www.wfmu.org/~davem Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmandl # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org