Ayhan Aytes on Tue, 17 May 2011 00:03:15 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> ISEA 2011 fees |
Hi nettimers, I would like to chime in as a local scholar/artist who is deeply concerned with the funding issue faced by ISEA11. I think before proposing a net based alternative event we need to consider some of the local aspects of organizing international conferences and how they might affect change in different parts of the world. In 2010 Istanbul was a European Capital of Culture which was funded by an extra tax applied nationally on certain crucial items such as gas. The organization of that year-long event was highly controversial because of the extra tax burden and the direct involvement of government officials in decisions made for the cultural program. As far as I know, that tax is still getting collected but not diverted for funding of any of the cultural events. Aside from this fact, currently the internet access in Turkey has been highly censored because of the political pressures applied by the current government on net based forms of expressions. There are further proposals to turn the net into another authoritarian tool in Turkey which would take affect in August 2011. Yesterday (May 15) there were country wide protests organized to address these proposed censorship measures. Here is the link to the press release: http://internetimedokunma.com/may-15th-2011-turkey-cencorship-press-release/ I think it would be valuable for ISEA in Istanbul to serve also as a venue for addressing the issue of censorship and supporting local activists in Turkey. I agree that electronic arts is a love child of techno-capital and academia but that bastard also bothers whole lot of old forms of authoritarian systems and that might be one of the reasons why ISEA had a hard time in getting funding in Turkey. I don't mean to suggest a mission for ISEA to change the world but this issue goes to the heart of the question of the artistic production in networked social systems and it makes total sense for ISEA to be a natural venue for a discussion of that. Although I don't want to open a can of worms about ISEA's general mission here, I agree that one way to change the current perception is to create more events that engage with real issues that affect the existential conditions of the net based forms of expression. Best, Ayhan Aytes Ph.D. Candidate Communication and Cognitive Science University of California San Diego On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Heiko Recktenwald < heikorecktenwald@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 15.05.2011 17:08, schrieb roberta buiani: > > I am all for "self-organize a collective inquiry into the >> development of planetary information/visualization/communication" as Brian >> suggests. > > The visual in > > "information/visualization/communication" > > is the big error. Read the philosophers in the Middle ages. And real > books, the discussiu0on is slow and must be slow and expensiv if yoiu > dont have a library next door. And speak with people. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org