allan siegel on Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:26:04 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Monbiot - neoliberalism redux |
Hello again, Some fragmentary remarks. Brian is spot on with the following: "For Foucault, capitalism is not a single, essentially unified system bearing essential contradictions, as the classical Marxists still think. Rather, it is a thoroughly political process and therefore it is susceptible of reformulation at each turning point or crisis. Now, you can respond like the Regulation school or even Deleuze and Guattari, and say that capitalism continually changes certain axiomatic propositions, in order that its major principle of endless accumulation through labor exploitation can continue. That's what I think. But such a statement still demands that one understand each new bundle of axioms, with its inner variations and their political origins, as well as their specific consequences. I don't see any other way to confront neoliberalism. Two points are key here, seeing "capitalism.. [as] a thoroughly political process and therefore it is susceptible of reformulation at each turning point or crisis." and the necessity or ability to grapple with "each new bundle of axioms" if any form of viable ideological alternative is able to sustain itself in the face of the neoliberalism's relentless onslaught. In this context what is sometimes difficult to comprehend, or come to terms with, is the multi-pronged dimensions of this bundle of axioms and their historical depth. For example, "Bentham's formula: `the more strictly we are watched, the better we behave.' " As Dardot & Laval point out this is one of the governing principles of neoliberal rationality. And, "bureaucrats must as far as possible conduct themselves like entrepreneurs." These principles lie at the heart of neoliberal governing policies. So, the corollary to capitalism's ability to reformulate or retool itself - not just during periods of crisis - is the manner in which seek to manage social relations. Thus we have Lippman's 80 year old formulation in which "the agenda of neo-liberalism was guided by the need for constant adaptation [emphasis added] of human beings... based on general unrelenting competition." These concepts have now become so entrenched that what is now called for is a complete re-imagining of the web of relationships that link governmental bodies with the corporate world and similarly the a re-imagining of the political processes that underpin the neoliberal status quo. This task is formidable in that it requires dismantling the false consciousness that permeates neoliberal social reality; Foucault saw most clearly that neoliberalism was "a political project that endeavours to create a social reality that it suggests already exists." In such a world it is not difficult to imagine droves of chicken-littles who swallow the `daily news' and consume endlessly to prevent the sky from falling. allan # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: