Brian Holmes on Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:25:17 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Fwd: Re: Forms of decisionism |
A science like geology, which is constitutive to the technology of mining and all that it entails, is now recognizing human activity as fundamental to the very baseline of objectivity, namely, what used to be called nature. Scientific theory is one of the causes of the "new nature" that we experience in the Anthropocene. That too can no longer be denied. So the epistemological distinction between theory and ideology is necessarily changing.... The simplistic distinction between the two is way out of date. For at least half a century, circular causality has brought the deepest insights into the human predicament.
best, Brian On 07/20/2016 12:12 AM, Morlock Elloi wrote:
Maybe I'm making mistake assuming that "theory" here means normative/scientific theory, something that strives to provide predictions in sustainable and repeatable fashion. Theories that predict past are useless, and what someone feels the future should be and steps to achieve that is, in my mind, ideology and not a theory. There is a big difference: a theory can be wrong, ideology cannot. The prevailing slippery allusions to the scientific meaning of theory seem intentional.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: