David Garcia on Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:07:13 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> the necropolitics of the BLM uprising? |
Many Thanks Steve, and great to see the list being used in this way again. I’m looking for clarification on whether I am right on a distinction that I think you are making. Sorry if I am being stupid: Is a key distinction between 1. an uprising to resist oppression in which (CAE) argue sacrifice of the innocent is acceptable and 2. the concept of a ‘just war’ (e.g. the Bush/Blaire Middle East wars) in which, innocent deaths are completely unacceptable ? If so are there any circumstances in which CAE would support a state military action or intervention other that as defenders (e.g. WW2). Would it for example be acceptable for a state to intervene to prevent genocide? Would that fall under the category of a ‘just war’ which CAE could never endorse ? David Garcia On 9 Jun 2020, at 02:15, Kurtz@mx.kein.org wrote: > > uprising is a tactic that can be called upon to resist oppression, and > the sacrifice of the innocent in this case is acceptable? > > > > Unlike with biopolitics, we believe we cannot make an appeal to justice. > One cannot argue for the "just" killing of innocent people. This debate > of just killing of the innocent is centuries old in the guise of can > there be a just war? CAE tends to fall on the side of "No, there can't > be a just war.” # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: