Prem Chandavarkar on Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:36:52 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> The War to come ... |
Andreas, The focus on the US was not to cast that country as the sole imperialist, with Russia acting only out of valid security concerns. Russia also has imperial impulses (Syria, for example), although not at the scale of the days of the Soviet Union. And there are other imperial actors, including, as you point out, some non-state actors. My focus on the US comes from two fronts:
I agree that, while Pax Americana may be a dominant form of imperialism, it is necessary to articulate a critique of the whole spectrum of imperial actors. I also agree, enthusiastically, that it is necessary to foreground the interests and fears of non-imperial actors, but have doubts on whether this will be enough to delegitimise the imperiological narrative. It is probably necessary to do both. Best, Prem |
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: