olia lialina on Fri, 11 Mar 2022 16:04:28 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Disarming Chekhov’s Gun |
https://pad.profolia.org/s/chekhovs_gun
The plan was to write a description for a
series of lectures and conversations at Merz Akademie in
upcoming semester, but it became a manifesto, I'd like to share
with you.
Disarming Chekhov’s Gun
The mantra passed down from generation to generation “you can’t put a loaded gun on stage if no one means to fire it” first appeared in a letter Chekhov wrote to a young writer, criticizing the way his vaudeville was structured:
"Dear Alexander Semyonovich!
I received your vaudeville and immediately read it. It’s
beautifully written, but its architecture is obnoxious. It’s not
scenic at all. Think about it. Dasha’s first monologue is
completely unnecessary. It stands out like a sore thumb. It would
have fit if you wanted to make Dasha more than just a supporting
role, and if this monolog – that promises a lot to the audience –
had anything to do with the content or the effects of the play.
You can’t put a loaded gun on stage if no one means to fire it.
You can’t make promises. Let Dasha be silent altogether – that’s
better."[1]
Dasha, her first monologue and its unkept promise did not go down
in history, but the analogy of the loaded gun left on stage
unfired did: Chekhov’s Gun – the dramaturgic principle that
advises authors to remove irrelevant elements from their stories,
be it in novels, theater plays, or later in films and television
scripts. Closer to the end of the 20th century, the concept also
entered the digital realm, from interactive fiction to Extended
Reality.
But it is not only in literature and entertainment of all genres
and media where playwrights’ rules are applied. Dramaturgic
principles have long taken over the socio-political spheres of our
lives that are computer mediated since digital environments like
Aristotelian drama happened to be an “imitation of an action with
a beginning, middle and end, which is meant to be enacted in real
time”, as Brenda Laurel pointed out in Computers as Theatre, 1991.
A century after Chekhov warned against leaving unfired guns on
stage, Laurel recognized the same pattern – “gratuitous
incidents”[2] and the unwanted effect it can have in the design of
software, when on staging an interactor’s experience. To properly
script user’s expectations and actions no minor detail standing in
the way of “constraining what is probable”[3].
30 years later software got more sophisticated, complex, and
literally invisible. It means that today these constraints need to
be tighter than ever before. Designers of chatbots, robots, and
immersive environments take care that guns are fired or
nonexistent. To succeed in fully automated environments, CGR –
Chekhov’s Gun Recognition[4] algorithm, was suggested recently
…and then there is the concept of Schrödinger’s Gun[5], a
combination of Schrödinger’s Cat and Chekhov’s Gun, an algorithm
that can render any numerically represented element from
gratuitous to necessary. Everything can be turned into a loaded
gun in computer generated environments.
Outside of tropes and virtual worlds, the playwright’s principle
has become a curse. There is Alec Baldwin’s Gun that was
supposedly just a prop, and currently, there are Putin’s guns that
we so much wanted to believe were just for show, not loaded at
all, or at least would not fire.
What if Chekhov’s letter was never written, got lost or was simply
ignored? What if the unimportant Dasha had a chance to recite her
unnecessary monologue?
Imagine a world where our lives weren’t shaped by the predictable
laws of drama and we were not a part of Aristotle’s tragic
progression.
Leave the guns unfired and give the stage to Dasha!
--
Т. 3. Письма, Октябрь 1888 — декабрь 1889. — М.: Наука, 1976.
— С. 273—275. [my translation] Source
http://chehov-lit.ru/chehov/letters/1888-1889/letter-707.htm ↩︎
Laurel B, Computers as Theatre, 1993 p.74 ↩︎
Ibid., p.76 ↩︎
Tikhonov A., Yamshchikov I. Chekhov’s Gun Recognition, 2021
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13855v1 ↩︎
Robertson J., YoungR.M., Finding Schrödinger’s Gun, AIDE,
October 2014 ↩︎
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: