Keith Sanborn via nettime-l on Tue, 17 Oct 2023 04:32:48 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> silence on Palestine? |
Checked out Rahul’s references. I guess the bot is or is using isn’t too good of a reader in English German or French. None of them say what he purports them to say. > On Oct 16, 2023, at 5:44 PM, Brian Holmes via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org> wrote: > > Rahul, first of all, I too am thankful that we can actually discuss these > issues on nettime, because in the world at large, the space for discussion > is narrow, while the space for bitter animosity seems almost infinite. > > As stated in an earlier post, I think we are before a tragic situation > which ensnares all participants in a trap not of their own making. This is > why I don't justify one population over the other in this conflict. To me, > what would be important is not that one side wins. What's important is to > get out of the trap. > > Anyway, there is a point which needs to be clarified. I think we all > understand that under the norms of international law, Hamas is a terrorist > organization, whereas the IDF upholds, or at least claims to uphold, the > humanitarian rules of military engagement. > > However, the analysis of the people who disagree with you - including > myself on this point - is that since 1987 at least, the disproportionality > of Palestinian deaths compared to Israeli deaths indicates a failure of > humanitarian law as applied by the IDF. In the previous conflicts involving > Gaza, the Palestinian death toll is on the order of twenty times higher, at > least. This is due to the vast inequality in terms of weaponry, > institutional structure, international support and logistical resources - > exactly the inequality that has made it possible for Israel to hold two > million people in an open-air prison, and to pursue the takeover of > Palestinian land on the West Bank. It is impossible to see the humanitarian > character of military operations that result in such large numbers of > civilian deaths. > > The disproportion is well known and can be seen in the chart on this page: > > https://today.lorientlejour.com/article/1352614/how-many-people-has-the-hamas-israel-war-killed-so-far.html > > A humanitarian law that allows a country to slaughter civilians at that > level of disproportionality appears first of all to contradict its own > tenets, and more importantly, it looks like a transparently false > justification for violent domination. Already in the current conflict, we > are seeing twice as many Palestinian deaths. If the number rises to ten or > twenty times as many, the trap will be complete. Not only the Arab world > will look on Israel and the US as mortal enemies, but the entire Global > South will come to see the Western alliance system as a hypocritical force > of bloodthirsty domination. And so we will fight wars until the flames of > climate change consume us. > > Despite the grief and rage, Israel should exercise restraint now, before > the situation becomes terminally polarized. As the more powerful party, the > country should analyze its own role in producing the conflict - just as the > US should have done after 9/11. Not to do so is a failure on every level, > including that of military strategy. Netanyahu's government is directly to > blame for this strategic failure, and it looks very likely that he will be > blamed for it by a majority of Israelis. Supporting them does not imply > anti-Semitism, nor even less, justification of Hamas. It's just being > against the war party. > > Anyway, in terms of the discussion here, I wanted to clarify what looks to > me like a fundamental point of disagreement. > > best, Brian > -- > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: https://www.nettime.org > # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org