Oleg Kireev on Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:08:19 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> mailradek no. 10 |
Moscow-based magazine "Radek", dedicated to theory, art and politics continues the project "mailradek in english". The information about the magazine is available on the Website: http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Coffeehouse/1457. Everybody who doesn't receive it can send a "subscribe english mailradek" e-mail to radek@glasnet.ru, and we'll include him into the mailing list. Our address is: Russia 117333 Moscow, Vavilova 48-237, for O.Kireev. tel./fax:(095)137 71 31. text no. 68 30.12.1998-15.01.1999 At early December Avdei Ter-Oganyan, an artist, at the art fair "Art Manege"*opening, proposed the audience to "defile" the Orthodox icons' reproductions and broke some of them with the hammer. We know his aim wasn't a desecration, but a means of his witty intellectual dispute with the Moscow radical artists (a parodic repetition of gestures with which they were shocking the public in the early 1990s) and that his work has been grounded on such manner for some time by now. There were the Orthodox activists who didn't know that and who called for his subordination. Ter-Oganyan was cast away from Manege by their efforts and now he finds himself under the legal case for "provoking an inter-confessional discord". Priests in churches give their laity to sign "the letters of rage" addressed to the General prosecutional office. The radical artists he's been parodying have got a habit of laughing upon the hysterical screemings of the fundamentalist newspapers, and that usually didn't lead to anything serious. Those times are gone, now the prison threatens the "desecrator". Radical art of Brener, Osmolovsky and Kulik elaborated the genre of action-situation during the 90s. Situation consists not only of artistic action, but also of the social context's reaction on it. Parodying them in the art context, Avdei, consciously or not, realized their political strategy. The church itself has been making the varied "actions" for a long time already: it receives the monumental buildings in the city center, fills the public space with clerical propaganda, ever and everywhere supports power in all its undertakings (regardless of wheather it's Yeltsin or Luzhkov), simultaneously proclaims its distance from any politics and just grieves for the loss of spirituality. Not only the Orthodox believers (it's their duty) took part in scandalizing the Avdei's action, but the very secular people as well. They claimed to be "abused" too. What a high morality underlies the doings of moralists who hurry up vying each other to express the "indignation", the "deep affliction", the "decisive protest" against the condemned and doomed immoralist! Relations between the secular power and the church are mutually satisfying: the first feels comfortable not only through veiling its businesses with rhetorical speeches on morality, but through supporting them with references to eternal values as well, for the second it's better to keep a silence. Everyone knows how it participated in the state property's privatization and what income the Moscow partiarchy does get from the particularly spiritual stuff such as tobacco and alcohol import (thanks to the privileged taxing). The hero of the scandal is an artist with concrete history (one of the most talented authors of 90s, participator of many international projects, his works are displayed in the Russian museum). But let's presuppose that it's some anonymous activist, someone like Ivan Sokolov, a trial on whom for the Nicolas the Second monument's explosion started not long ago. The society is anonymous too, and its interests are anonymous, but someone must express them. The juridicial system is not an abstract dimension of a pure reason and justice, but it expresses these interests' intersections. We have to express our interests much more and stronger than Avdei for to make church and others stop fucking our brains. A shameful silence of the art community's bosses, such as Misiano or Guelman and the "free press" is a political blindness, since it will be not difficult for the church to find a bit of their sins too. The judge won't decide anything. The practics of state and church violence are to be answered by the concrete practics of resistance only. P.S. If someone were able to publish some info about the events, it would be a significant help in Avdei Ter-Oganyan's case. Please send it by post address or fax to the *RADEK* office. Oleg Kireev translation: Irina Aristarkhova realization: mailradek --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl