t byfield on Mon, 31 May 1999 18:09:38 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> [RRE] database legislation [USA] |
----- Forwarded Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 22:33:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Phil Agre <pagre@alpha.oac.ucla.edu> To: "Red Rock Eater News Service" <rre@lists.gseis.ucla.edu> Subject: [RRE]database legislation [I have taken the liberty of reformatting this.] =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). Send any replies to the original author, listed in the From: field below. You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not use the "redirect" command. For information on RRE, including instructions for (un)subscribing, see http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/rre.html or send a message to requests@lists.gseis.ucla.edu with Subject: info rre =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 14:46:38 -0600 From: EDUCAUSE <EDUCAUSE@EDUCAUSE.EDU> To: UPDATE@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WASHINGTON-UPDATE] Database Legislation Moves Through House EDUCAUSE: Transforming Education Through Information Technologies http://www.educause.edu EDUCAUSE WASHINGTON UPDATE --- MAY 28, 1999 ***IN THIS ISSUE*** CONGRESSIONAL PASSAGE OF DATABASE PROTECTION BILL APPEARS LIKELY THIS SESSION: (1) CONTROVERSIAL DATABASE PROTECTION LEGISLATION NEARS HOUSE FLOOR AS BILL'S SPONSOR PROMISES TO ADDRESS REMAINING ISSUES (2) ALTERNATIVE DATABASE BILL INTRODUCED IN HOUSE VIEWED FAVORABLY BY LIBRARY, NONPROFIT COMMUNITY *** CONGRESSIONAL PASSAGE OF DATABASE PROTECTION BILL APPEARS LIKELY THIS SESSION: (1) CONROVERSIAL DATABASE PROTECTION LEGISLATION NEARS HOUSE FLOOR AS BILL'S SPONSOR PROMISES TO ADDRESS REMAINING ISSUES The House Judiciary Committee passed a series of measures on Wednesday designed to update America's intellectual property laws. The most contentious of the bills is the "Collections of Information Antipiracy Act" (H.R. 354) which aims to protect the work of database creators. According to the bill's sponsor, Rep. Howard Coble (R-NC), HR 354 is a "balanced proposal" with the goal of stimulating more data collections and competition in this industry. However, the education and research communities, along with the Clinton Administration, have criticized the bill as being overly broad and fear it may have a "chilling effect" on the ability of researchers to access and exchange information. The library and university community has also cited the potential rising costs of accessing information if database creators are afforded what some have criticized "as ownership over facts." Revisions in the bill have helped to allay some concerns of the education and research communities. For instance, rather than requiring a showing of harm to the "actual or potential market" before legal recourse, it must be proven that the "primary or related market for a protected collection of information" has been harmed. Another provision approved at the committee markup provides relief for Internet service providers from civil actions, unless the provider willfully violates the law. The term 'Internet service provider' is defined to include "an entity offering the transmission, routing or providing of connections for digital online communications, between or among points specified by a user, of material of the user's choosing, without modification to the content of the material as sent or received." The Copyright Office and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice would be directed to conduct a study whether the defense allowing an employee or agent of a nonprofit institution to extract government information from a non-governmental source (if such information was not publicly available) should be expanded to include collections of information "that do not incorporate all or a substantial part of a government collection of information." The study and report to Congress must be conducted within three years of enactment of this bill. Rep. Coble conceded that the bill is still "a work in progress" and promised to work with Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) (who raised the administration's concerns at the markup) to ensure that education and library concerns are addressed before sending the bill to the House floor. (2) ALTERNATIVE DATABASE BILL INTRODUCED IN HOUSE VIEWED FAVORABLY BY LIBRARY, NONPROFIT COMMUNITY As Rep. Coble's "Collections of Information Antipiracy Act" makes its way to the House floor, another database measure was introduced last week that appears to be gaining some support among the library and university communities. House Commerce Committee chairman Rep. Thomas Bliley (R-Va), along with Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-La) (Chair of the Telecom subcommittee) and three other cosponsors, introduced the "Consumer and Investor Access to Information Act of 1999" (HR 1858). Touted as a consumer protection bill, this proposal attempts to strike a balance between protecting the rights of publishers of electronic databases without allowing their claim of proprietary ownership to restrict access to facts and information that traditionally have been part of the public domain. The bill appears to be more narrowly focused than its counterpart. For instance, the bill would prohibit the duplication of another database to be used in an a competitive manner that "displaces substantial sales or licenses of the database of which it is a duplicate." Individuals or entities using information collected by another's database for scientific, educational, or research uses shall not be deemed in violation of the law if such use is "not part of a consistent pattern engaged in for the purpose of direct commercial competition with that other person." The American Library Association and over 131 other for-profit and nonprofit organizations have come out in favor of this bill. [see joint statement at the American Library Association website: http://www.databasedata.org/Statement/statement.html] To view a draft of the "Consumer and Investor Access to Information Act" [in PDF format]: http://com-notes.house.gov/cchear/hearings106.nsf/8eaabcee30ee07ee852566f900 700f0d/11b0c73a05c02702852567760077af12/$FILE/DATABASE_001.PDF *** Written from EDUCAUSE'S Washington office, "The EDUCAUSE Washington Update" is a free service of EDUCAUSE, an international nonprofit association dedicated to transforming higher education through information technologies. Anyone may subscribe to the Update by sending e-mail to listserv@listserv.educause.edu with "subscribe update firstname lastname" in the body of the message. To unsubscribe, send a "signoff update" command to the same address. If you would like more information about the Update or would like to offer comments or suggestions, please contact Garret Sern at gsern@educause.edu. ----- Backwarded --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl