Károly Tóth on Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:21:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Nettime-nl] 'Internetkunst' |
FROM YOUR Z.G.C.P.S.J.F.F.
__________________________________________
So which is it?
"not art" (1997, without punctuation by the director of cbk-rotterdam (cbk=center for the visual arts) grtnx kroy __________________________________________ ZERO G CROSSPOST SERVICE JUST FOR FUN
__________________________________________
zero g artlab rotterdam
Károly Tóth karoly.toth@xs4all.nl www.xs4all.nl/~are __________________________________________ zero g artlab rotterdam is an independent art-lab. The lab is in an evolving process of exchage with initiatives of individuals and institutions, based on mutual sympathy. __________________________________________ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "nettime's_anal_editor" <nettime@bbs.thing.net> > To: <nettime-l@bbs.thing.net> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:35 AM > Subject: <nettime> net*&%$!art digest [thomas, hopkins, turgeon] > > > > Re: <nettime> net?art survey > > "clement Thomas" <ctgr@free.fr> > > John Hopkins <jhopkins@uiah.fi> > > david turgeon <david.t@steam.ca> > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > > From: "clement Thomas" <ctgr@free.fr> > > Subject: Re: [thingist] net?art survey > > Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:40:06 +0100 > > > > http://www.net-art.org > > > > watch your back ! > > http://www.NNet-art.org > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > from: "Nino Rodriguez" <nino@pobox.com> > > to: <list@rhizome.org>; <thingist@bbs.thing.net>; <nettime@bbs.thing.net> > > sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:10 PM > > subject: [thingist] net?art survey > > > > > > > So which is it? > > <...> > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > > Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:45:47 -0700 > > From: John Hopkins <jhopkins@uiah.fi> > > Subject: Re: <nettime> net?art survey > > > > >So which is it? > > > > It's > > > > > netart (Tate) > > > > > > > > > "an impromptu portrait of online spirituality" > > > > > > > > > net.art (Walker) > > > > > > > > > "Just click on a hyperlinked area to start" > > > > > > > > > net-art (Whitney) > > > > > > > > >"a trippy online experience" > > > > > > > > > net art (Documenta) > > > > > > > > > "a blend of acid-trip visuals and tech-nerd inventiveness" > > > > isn't it? > > > > jh > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 14:33:55 -0500 > > From: david turgeon <david.t@steam.ca> > > Subject: Re: <nettime> net?art survey > > > > >So which is it? > > > netart > > > net.art > > > net-art > > > net art > > > > basically the question is: what meaning does punctuation have? a dot used > > to mean something purely utilitarian such as "this sentence stops" or > "this > > is an abbreviation". OO programming, & internet addressing, use dots in > > new contexts (they denote a hierarchy), so it doesn't seem so unusual to > > call something "net.art" although using periods is a "wrong" way to form a > > neologism. in this sense "net-art" is more correct but it is (to me) far > > more awkward (& perhaps inaccurate because of its obsolescence) than "net > > art" or "netart" which both seem more flexible. > > > > another interesting aspect of the use of the dot in "net.art" is that it > > somehow turns the internet naming hierarchy on its head. a correct > > internet address should be "art.net", so "net.art" gives the feeling that > > it's the network that runs through art rather than the other way > > around. on the other hand, if we follow OO conventions, we get the method > > "art" as an element of the object "net", which is more cynical than the > > previous interpretation. on the other hand, it implies that "art" would > > exist in other contexts: kitchen.art, computer.art, land.art... it posits > > "art" as a transient property of everything. > > > > perhaps the period is eventually going to replace the hyphen in our > > vocabulary. stranger things have happened. we can also think of a > > language where words can be lumped together with dots, as with OO > > programming, but i'll leave that to the scholars out there. > > > > with all that being said, personally i have a fondness for the variety of > > spellings, & i would find it a waste to make one of them "official." > > > > have a nice day > > ~ david > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > > # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body > > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net > > >
|