Volker Grassmuck on Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:05:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[rohrpost] Cisler on World InfoCon |
hier Steve Cislers Bericht auf [bytesforall_readers] über die World-Info-Con Amsterdam 2002 The Network Society of Control Amsterdam, December 6 - 7, 2002 http://world-information.org/wio/program/amsterdam/events/1036596740 ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Letter from Amsterdam: World-InfoCon December 6-7, 2002 Steve Cisler <cisler@pobox.com> It is exciting to return to Amsterdam. In spite of the high prices, there is so much to do, so many people to visit, interesting foods, and attractions for tourists, gardeners, book-lovers, artists, shoppers, and beer-drinkers. The narrow streets make cars unwelcome, but it is a wonderful city for walking, and there is frequent public transportation. For this trip I tried something different--a small inflatable kayak that weighed about 8 Kg. The cold overcast morning after I arrived, I set up the kayak on a canal walkway by the Max Euwe Plein near Stadhouderskade, dropped it in the water, and spent the morning touring the city from a very different vantage. It was a great way to view parts of the city. Few other boats were out, possibly because it is not tourist season. Later I walked around town, and mixed with the Sintklaas crowds. The walls are covered with posters advertising everything from anarchist meetings to sex businesses to sporting events, magic mushrooms, and musical groups. There is a very lively art scene, and I saw a number of posters for gallery openings and one that was somewhat sinister. It advertised the event that brought me to Holland. He stands out for his blandness. Business suit, crewcut, an earpiece to keep in touch with his team leader, and an open newspaper. But he's looking elsewhere, over his shoulder, at a suspicious character, probably looking at you and listening as well. This man-in-black is the poster child for World-Information.Org's exhibit and conference in Amsterdam. I arrived near the end of the month-long exhibition to attend the two-day conference held at De Balie, a famous hang out for artists, activists, and even a few information policy geeks. It hosts many art events and convenes meetings such as this one. In the past, Next Five Minutes was held here, and a small watershed event, Tulipomania.com took place in June 2000, just as the dot com bubble had begun to burst. De Balie is located in a famous square, the Leidseplein, so it gets a lot of traffic, tourists, and people who just want to have a coffee, beer, and smoke as they talk. Every town should have a hangout like De Balie. There are free Internet access machines, a theater that seats about 150 people, a few meeting rooms on the side, and an open area on the floor above the bar and dining area. The walls in this area are covered with the most unusual wallpaper I have seen. At first it looks like an old marbling pattern or some finely rendered fractal design. When you pay more attention you realize it is hair and skin. In fact, it's the back hair of some anonymous man. The pattern repeats itself forming parallel lines that crawl up the wall. Very creepy. However, the whole atmosphere of De Balie is conducive to great conversation, both unstructured around the tables and bar and more structured in the meeting hall where the two day conference was held. The themes of World InfoCon were "Security paranoia in the world-info-sphere" (surveillance technology) for day one and "Building the digital commons" and the free exchange of information on day two. It was publicized online and on posters seen throughout Amsterdam. Concurrently, there was an education program for school kids, a temporary media lab for workshops and media discussions, and a month-long exhibit at De Oude Kerk, a 13th century church that housed projects dealing with several themes: the world info-structure, future heritage , and World-C4U, about older and current security and surveillance technologies. Considering the publicity, the turnout seemed light. Perhaps you have to have an intrinsic interest in information in all its mutations to be attracted to such a meeting. The exhibits made sense if you were aware of the issues, or better yet, had attended the conference. Some artists had tended their exhibits and offered commentary to visitors, but the day I attended only Konrad Becker, who is the Executive Director, was at the entrance to his maze of information-rich billboards. The rest of the exhibits were not that accessible to the average person, and that was, for me, the underlying challenge. Information issues are not immediately interesting or compelling. They must be tied to people's work, their identity, their freedom, their health, and their environment. Most people do not think about information flows or intellectual property rights, and most information is still passed from one individual to another, and this is supplemented by media blizzard which varies in intensity depending on how much you watch television, how many newspapers or magazines you consume, or how much time on line you spend with web logs, e-zines, and all the other forms of information that make up the Web. Eveline Lubbers, a journalist and activist, has been tracking the surveillance methods of police and intelligence agencies since the 1980's. More recently she has focused on the deceptive practices of public relations firms, and a book she edited, "Battling Big Business" has just been translated into Dutch. We met at a small coffee shop near the Old Church where she talked about her activities and some of the problems publicizing a book from a small publisher. In fact, her U.S. publisher had been in financial trouble, and the English version came out in the UK. Later, during the conference session, she dissected the Greenwash campaigns of some large oil companies. That evening we met again at the conference reception where a number of the speakers had gathered for a drink and introductions. What I value about the De Balie events is that I meet a few old friends and a good many people I would never run into in Silicon Valley or the other conferences and events I attend. Opening Day Day One opened with a talk by Chris Hables Gray, but unfortunately, I lost my notes on his presentation. Gray is the author of "Cyborg Handbook" and is in temporary exile in Montana. Next was an overview of surveillance by Konrad Becker who is executive director of World-Information.Org. This forty minute tour-de-force was perhaps the most interesting of the whole conference, but it is the most difficult to summarize because he packed so many quotes, facts, images, and observations into his talk which began with ancient Sumeria and took us through mind control techniques of intelligence agencies and the workings of surveillance organizations. Brian Holmes, an "anti-capitalist theorist" has been working on some very interesting mapping projects with the Parisian Bureau d'Etudes that looked at control structures in Europe and other interrelationships between companies, international organizations, and governments. On the flip side there were also maps of "civil society" which helped activists understand their own world. Talking later with Brian it seemed the collaborative act of researching the links and alliances was a process that built community and solidarity. The cartographic process made use of new icons and resulted in incredibly detailed Illustrator files which were more legible on screen than in the large paper formats which were handed out in the streets and during the recent European Social Forum in Florence. As he acknowledged you need to look at the maps in a very good light because of the small fonts and black text on blue background. A further development might be a database linked to the map to provide richer information about the points on the map, and activist-users would supply the depth of knowledge about individual points. Sort of the mosaic theory of intelligence gathering mixed with the participatory techniques to involve many people. Ryan Schoelerman, Buffalo, New York, had the most unusual story of anyone attending the workshop. After high school he enlisted in the U.S. Marines where all recruits were given batteries of tests to find skills and potential that may not have surfaced in civilian life. Ryan and his brother were found to have abilities to distinguish sounds and signals, so he was sent to training for 'elint" or electronic intelligence analysis. He was stationed, among other places, in Somalia, but he did not re-enlist after several years in the Corps. I heard that he had been in the NSA, but the program said CIA, so I guess this is the case of the truth being protected by a bodyguard of lies (to quote Churchill). At present he is in college and is involved in an art collective and has done some work with low power FM radio for community broadcasting and some interesting local hacks. Steve Kurtz of the Critical Art Ensemble, also from Buffalo, New York, had perhaps the most unusual and ambitious project: to re-engineer the Monsanto Roundup resistant canola seed. Though he is not a biologist, he certainly seemed to have gained (with the help of PubMed and some experts) the understanding of what might be done to attack the central genetic traits of this patented and protected controversial seed. At the World Information exhibit he has erected a bubble, a temperature controlled habitat where seeds he mailed to Amsterdam have been planted, and over the past few weeks he has been tending them and answering questions at the exhibit. He says that sabotage, a la Jose Bove (now serving jail time in France) is counter productive and allows the media and general public to look upon anti-GMO actions as just the work of crazy fringe groups. Steve sees his work as a more acceptable alternative, but I can see it positioned a "bio-terrorism" in the current season of fear. The afternoon sessions on public relations opened with a broad introduction by famed journalist academic Ben Badakian. This was followed by an overview of activities and trends by Sheldon Rampton of PR Watch and Eveline Lubbers. For the PR professional "communications is the engineering of consent." This is sometimes called the hypodermic method of PR where you inject your opinions into the minds of the masses. Sheldon read statements by leading PR people who stressed the threat of all the protest groups organizing, using the Internet, and undercutting the expensive work the PR firms are performing for their corporate clients. Both Sheldon and Lubbers explained to the group the wide range of PR tactics used by firms. These range of soft "reinvention" campaigns that would lead some people to think Shell is an environmental company not one drilling and selling petroleum products. Other firms offer much more aggressive services. There is even a service called "outrage management" where the PR firm figures out how much a company can do before provoking outrage on the part of the public. The two speakers were generally opposed to dialog between opposition groups and the corporations, because it is used to divide and conquer. Public Relations people categorize the protesters and opponents in four groups: realists, opportunists, idealists, and radicals. The techniques are to isolate the radicals and co-opt the others using various schemes. Several examples were cited where the PR efforts helped split the opposition and turned the story from one of citizens and non-profits fighting a company to fighting within an organization (Mothers Against Drunk Drivers was one) over tactics, leadership, or strategy. Each day, Eric Kluitenberg of De Balie, helped frame the day's theme with a short introduction. Day two focused on intellectual property rights and the various movements and methods of challenging the increasingly severe laws enacted at international, regional, and national levels most of which have narrowed the ability of the citizen or consumer to use, store, or manipulate the information. Volker Grassmuck, of Humboldt University, in Berlin, gave an excellent introduction to many of the issues, and this helped me later in the morning when I gave my short talk. He said that Free Software is getting the seal of approval from some governments, and is certainly gathering steam in term of understanding and richness of the pool of code being generated. He spoke about the rebellion of thousands of scientists who have demanded that scientific publications be put online six months after they appear in print. As librarians are aware, the cost of periodicals and especially scientific journals has been increasing astronomically, with some costing thousands of dollars for a one year subscription. He showed a project called the Wikipedia, a very open and collaborative knowledge generating effort. Anyone can change or edit an encyclopedia entry, and instead of disinformation or incomplete entries, the number of people writing and commenting have made stronger and more credible entries. Felix Stalder, one of the nettime moderators and originator of Open Flows, spoke about the "social dynamics of free content" which made me think about the early days of The Well where the elements he described helped make that online system a wonderful place for me to grow up, even though I was 42 when I started using it. Stalder said these systems allow different degrees of participation which blur the difference between creator and reader or consumer. People move in and out of involvement. The "space" of these content areas can be huge (as with Wikipedia. Leadership comes from contributions and acts of moderation and other kinds of participation. Joost Smiers, author of the forthcoming Arts Under Pressure seemed to be most worried about lack of diversity, not just in content but in distribution, using the example of documentary films (which are not easily distributed over the Net) and the few people who really decide what movies are distributed widely (Goldmember or Die Another Day showing on thousands of screens at the same time). He believed that copyright would implode and that states had the right to act if the market did not protect diversity. It seemed he mainly had in mind "American hegemony." and that he takes the idea of the Bulgarian Culture Board seriously. Bruce Girard, author of "Global Media Governance- A Beginner's Guide" talked about the increasing restrictions in what could be done with radio spectrum, and he was the only speaker who mentioned the upcoming World Summit on the Information Society (December 2003). My impression was that most people there did not have the interest or patience to deal with the United Nations/ITU procedural red tape. Other people I met said the growing influence of the corporate sector made them less interested in trying to influence the outcome or final statements. Several people who had been involved in the European Social Forum in Florence talked to me about the idea of a conference that would take place before WSIS and not oppose it but offer an alternative forum for discussion, statements, and possibly action. Arun Mehta from India said the idea of copying is the highest compliment one could pay and that there was nothing wrong with doing that with Microsoft Office or publications or music. He felt the system that was trying to criminalize millions of people for downloading MP3's could not be sustained. He also said that the intellectual property laws were killing people by denying them cheap drugs for life-threatening illnesses such as AIDS which is ravaging the subcontinent now. Darius Cuplinskas, head of the library and publishing program at Open Society Institute in Budapest, Hungary, showed some of the scholarly collaborative publishing efforts including the one OSI has spearheaded, the Budapest Open Access Initiative. He cited an interesting paper by Yochai Benkler, "Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm." I spoke about the role of libraries in building the digital commons which was not just content but the access tools to acquire the content, as well as the skills to find the content. I highlighted some large library digitization projects around the world and said that the increasingly rabid statements by publisher representatives was forcing a change in the relationship between libraries and publisher. To express it as a dichotomy, libraries want to give everything away, and publishers want to charge. This makes libraries, which used to be seen as neutral territory, as much more radical information collectives which are stealing the potential profits of CD, book, and database publishers. However, they remain the main intermediary to the world of electronic information for who cannot afford the subscriptions or do not own a computer hooked to the Internet. The trouble is they are not that strong in many countries, and these services are not available widely. The final open mike session was inconclusive about further action, though several people reacted positively to some of Arun Mehta's suggestions. Thanks to Eric Kluitenberg of DeBalie and to OSI, Budapest, in helping me attend. Other editors of the conference included Felix Stalder of Open Flows and Konrad Becker. There was a reader available of articles, papers, and interviews. Price was 7.5 Euros. -- ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~- -> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/C7EolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------- ~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: bytesforall_readers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------- End of forwarded message ------- -- act now: copy = right http://privatkopie.net schon 35.000 Unterschriften !!! new releases: Freie Software. Zwischen Privat- und Gemeineigentum http://freie-software.bpb.de home: http://waste.informatik.hu-berlin.de/Grassmuck ------------------------------------------------------- rohrpost - deutschsprachige Liste zur Kultur digitaler Medien und Netze Archiv: http://www.nettime.org/rohrpost http://post.openoffice.de/pipermail/rohrpost/ Ent/Subskribieren: http://post.openoffice.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rohrpost/