Andreas Broeckmann on Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:32:10 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: Ch. Meierhofer Notes from "Art in Public Space", Dortmund |
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:42:37 +0200 From: Christine Meierhofer <christine@v2.nl> Personal notes from the podium "Art in Public Space", Dortmund, June 17, 2000 The podium consisted of 8 speakers talking about art in public space from very different angles. (Stella Rollig, Olivier Reneau, Jochen Becker, Jesko Fezer, Axel Wieder, Stefan Roemer, Paul Ardenne) Stella Rollig, author and curator from Vienna, Austria, talked about the street as a very traditional but, under the present circumstances in Vienna, very active public space. She introduced 3 projects which use the street as a platform. The weekly demonstrations against the current government, the project "Bitte liebt Oesterreich" (Please Love Austria) by Christoph Schlingensief and a project commissioned by Zuerich Kosmos (an insurance company) by Robert Wilson. She pointed towards the very different approaches of the three things. The demonstrations as an activity that cannot be seen as an art project but is predominantly organized and promoted by people from the art world. Here structures that have been installed to carry out artproject are being used very effectively and present are a real irritation to the politicians. "Bitte liebt Oesterreich" is a project which quotes phenomenons like Big Brother as well as racism and provocation. 3 containers are placed on the most prominent square in the center of Vienna. Asylum seekers are kept in there and each day people from outside can call in and vote for one person who should be thrown out of the country. On the outside a poster was mounted saying "Auslaender raus" (foreigners out). This project evoked discussions on many levels, one of the most interesting ones (in my opinion) is whether it is appropriate or even allowed to write "Auslaender raus" in public space even if it is an artproject. The Viennese Cultural Official responsible for the permissions said that you can't censor art..... The Robert Wilson project is a laser/video piece for a large public display in Vienna's second district (which used to be the Jewish district before World War II). It has a branch in the city center. Also a container. You can go in there and watch the video which deals with the Jewish past. Stella Rollig was not very fond of that project since it copied artistic structures and used them mainly for commercial promotion. Following her talk was Olivier Reneau who first gave a lecture about land art and then introduced such projects in France. This stirred up the discussion whether the countryside and such projects could really be called art in public space. They were actually more considered museum pieces put into another environment. This led to a discussion about what public space really is, if it has ever really existed and how it could be defined. No real agreement was found. The next three talks dealt with architecture and how urban planning deals with the phrase public space. Jochen Becker showed the movie "Truman" while giving his lecture. Unfortunately it was so distracting from what he was saying that I didn't listen very closely ;-) He was focusing on the construction of artificial public spaces, meaning that there are spaces that aren't even public, because they are owned by a company but are made available to the public and therefore seem to be public space, but company rules apply. He was giving examples like the biggest mall of Germany in Oberhausen. Oberhausen being a rather small city, but the MacDonalds in the mall is the 4th most frequented in Germany. Or the new Sony Center in Berlin, which you can pass through via a street that doesn't allow bikes (company rules). As a conclusion he showed a promotional video for the new train station of Dortmund, which "wants to close the hole in the urban planning of the city", a huge "new center" for all activities. Once again commercial space taking over the tasks of public space. Jesko Fezer introduced very early examples of companies occupying/creating public space, like the Seagram Building in New York City built by Mies van der Rohe. Here the company gave up one third of the available space (which they bought for a lot of money) and declared it public, with water basin etc. Alex Wieder showed utopian urban planning projects which tried to reorganize public space in unconventional ways. Again the discussion over what the words public space actually mean occurred. Here I missed the focus on art a bit. In my opinion public art is not only defined by the space/environment where it is located but also by it's artistic content. About the last two lectures I cannot say much, since I only heard Stefan Roemer half way and Paul Ardenne not at all since I had to catch the train. Stefan Roemer started with showing a very interesting piece though. On the walls of a recently torn down house, where you still could see the former location of floors, walls etc., someone had put a graffiti saying: 0 m2 for rent, DM 580,- per month, German Blondine only. Above that on a small remaining part of the former floor a table and a chair was placed. Stefan Roemer said that this piece was placed so prominently in Cologne that basically everyone in the city knows it. And even though the person who did it is unknown it is a great example of a project (maybe even artwork?) in public space. He continued showing his own work, which was a bit too didactic for my taste ... and then I had to leave. Christine Meierhofer V2_001, Eendrachtsstraat 10, NL-3012 XL Rotterdam, T.+31.10.2067272, F.+31.10.2067271 http://www.v2.nl ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress