Re: Syndicate: OPINIONS NEEDED !!!!

[Chris Byrne <chris@cryptic.demon.co.uk>]

How about "structuralist"?

It seems to express the attitude of nn, and cohorts to the way the list
should behave...

Interesting approach to the mechanisms of listservs, but not what the
Syndicate was about.

Cheers


Chris


At 2:52 pm +0200 26/8/01, Jaka Zeleznikar wrote:
>Claudia Westermann wrote:
>
>> We have a name-problem. Inke, Andreas and Chris think the list should
>> change name. Well, I have also heard different opinions, but I would like
>> to hear some more or hear them again. Just at the moment it is a problem
>> that I., A., C. are not posting their opinions onto the list, and I would
>> very much like that if you feel like you can ask them, maybe you ask them
>> personally for their reasons. Maybe then you post a summary onto the list
>> or whatever. It is not fair that Anna has to go through these discussions
>> over and over, I think.
>
>I don't see a need to change the name.
>If Inke, Andreas and Chris wish that list change the name it would be
>nice if they would let the whole list to know this and discouss this on
>the list. It's very easy to s*bscribe/*ns*bscribe or to ask someone to
>post on the list instead of you. So we can know their reasons and think
>about them.
>
>
>
>> And for me to say, I would very much like to hear from you what you think
>> Syndicate was, is and should be (with old or new name), because I ask
>> myself, if there are really people who need this forum. I asked a few
>> people personally, but I would like also them to post their opinions to the
>> list and everybody else too.
>
>There is +/- 450 people s*bscribed to the list. I think there is no need
>to think that nobody needs this list.
>
>Syndicate list i see as mix of new net art works announcement,
>conference/festival calls, art or politics discussion, some art
>(interventions/ascii,...), some information on art events and reports,
>...
>
>I +/- like it the way it is. It would be practical to make different
>topics a channels, something like on Rhizome.
>
>Web page: with log-in members could maintain or update some information
>about themselves (if they wish so). Beside this, introduction and
>archive i think there is not a big need to have anything else on the
>page.
>
>It would be interesting to read some opinions on Syndicate's page. All
>the time we discuss about the list only. + will page move to another
>server also?
>
>-----Syndicate mailinglist--------------------
>Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate
>to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate@eg-r.isp-eg.de>
>to unsubscribe, write to <majordomo@eg-r.isp-eg.de>, in
>the body of the msg: unsubscribe syndicate your@email.adress


--------------------------------------------------------
Chris Byrne                          chris@mediascot.org
--------------------------------------------------------
New Media Scotland                 tel: +44 131 477 3774
P.O. Box 23434, Edinburgh EH7 5SZ  fax: +44 131 477 3775
Scotland, UK                    http://www.mediascot.org
--------------------------------------------------------


-----Syndicate mailinglist--------------------
Syndicate network for media culture and media art
information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate
to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate@eg-r.isp-eg.de>
to unsubscribe, write to <majordomo@eg-r.isp-eg.de>, in
the body of the msg: unsubscribe syndicate your@email.adress