katarina on Wed, 31 Mar 1999 01:22:57 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: Bombing the Baby with the Bathwater |
> Bombing the Baby with the Bathwater > by Veran Matic > Belgrade, March 30, 1999 > The air strikes against Yugoslavia were supposed to stop the Milosevic war > machine. The ultimate goal is ostensibly to support the people of Kosovo, > as well as those of Serbia, who are equally victims of the Milosevic > regime. > In fact the bombing has jeopardised the lives of 10.5 million people and > unleashed an attack on the fledgling forces of democracy in Kosovo and > Serbia. It has undermined the work of reformists in Montenegro and the > Serbian entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina and their efforts to promote peace. > The bombing of Yugoslavia demonstrates the political impotence of US > President Bill Clinton and the Western alliance in averting a human > catastrophe in Kosovo. The protection of a population under threat is a > noble duty, but it requires a clear strategy and a coherent end game. As > the situation unfolds on the ground and in the air day by day, it is > becoming more apparent that there is no such strategy. Instead, NATO is > fulfilling the prophecy of its own doomsaying: each missile that hits the > ground exacerbates the humanitarian disaster that NATO is supposed to be > preventing. > It's not easy to stop the war machine once its power has been unleashed. > But I urge the members of NATO to pause for a moment and consider the > consequences of what they are doing. Analysts are already asking whether > the air strikes are still really about saving Kosovo Albanians. Just how > far are NATO members prepared to go? What comes next after the "military" > targets? What happens if the war spreads? All of these terrifying > questions must be answered, although I suspect that few will want to live > with the historical burden of having answered them. > The same questions crowded my mind as I sat in a Belgrade prison on the > first day of the NATO attack on my country. Whiling away the hours in the > cell I shared with a murder suspect, I asked myself what the West's aim was > for "the morning after". The image of NATO taking its finger off the > trigger kept coming to mind. I've seen no indication so far that there is > a clear plan to follow up the Western military resolve. > My friends in the West keep asking me why there is no rebellion. Where are > the people who poured onto the streets every day for three months in 1996 > to demand democracy and human rights? Zoran Zivkovic, the opposition mayor > of the city of Nis answered that last week: "Twenty minutes ago my city > was bombed. The people who live here are the same people who voted for > democracy in 1996, the same people who protested for a hundred days after > the authorities tried to deny them their victory in the elections. They > voted for the same democracy that exists in Europe and the US. Today my > city was bombed by the democratic states of the USA, Britain, France, > Germany and Canada! Is there any sense in this?" > Most of these people feel betrayed by the countries which were their > models. Only today a missile landed in the yard of our correspondent in > Sombor. It didn't explode, fortunately, but many others have in many other > people's yards. These people are now compelled to take up arms and join > their sons who are already serving in the army. With the bombs falling all > around them nobody can persuade them - though some have tried - that this > is only an attack on their government and not their country. > It may seem cynical that I am writing this from the security of my office > in Belgrade - secure, that is, compared to Pristina, Djakovica, Podujevo > and other places in Kosovo. But I can't help asking one question: How can > F16s stop people in the street killing one another? Only days before the > NATO aggression began, Secretary-General Solana suggested establishing a > "Partnership for Democracy" in Serbia and the other countries of the former > Yugoslavia to promote stability throughout the region. Then, in a rapid > U-turn, he gave the order to attack Yugoslavia. > With these attacks, it seems to me, the West has washed its hands of the > people, Albanians, Serbs and others, living in the region. Thus the sins > of the government have been visited on the people. Is this just? There are > many more factors in the choice of a nation's government than merely the > will of the voters on election day. If a stable, democratic rule is to be > established, and the rise of populists, demagogues and other impostors > avoided, the public must first of all be enlightened. In other words there > must be free media. NATO's bombs have blasted the germinating seeds of > democracy out of the soil of Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro and ensured that > they will not sprout again for a very long time. The pro-democratic forces > in Republika Srpska, the Bosnian Serb entity, have been jeopardised and > with them the Dayton Peace Accords. NATO's intervention has also given the > green light for a local war against Montenegro's pro-democracy president, > Milo Djukanovic. > The free media in Serbia has for years opposed nationalism, hatred and war. > As a representative of those media, and as a man who has more than once > faced the consequences of my political beliefs, I call on President Bill > Clinton to put a stop to NATO's attack on my country. I call on him to > begin negotiations which aim at securing the right to a peaceful life and > democracy for all the people in Yugoslavia, regardless of their ethnic > background. > As a representative of the free media I know too well the need for people > on all sides of the conflict to have information. Those inside the country > need to be aware of international debate as well as what is happening > throughout this country. The international public needs the truth about > what is happening here. But in place of an unfettered flow of accurate > information, all of us hear only war propaganda - Western rhetoric > included. Of course truth is always the first casualty in wartime. Here > and now, journalists are also being murdered. > BOX [entrfile] > Radio B92 is continuing its work as much as the circumstances of war > permit. It is continuing to broadcast news on the Internet at > http://www.b92.net, via satellite and through a large number of radio > stations around the world which continue to carry its programs out of > solidarity. > VERAN MATIC is editor-in-chief of Belgrade's banned Radio B92 and a leading > peace activist. He has won many international awards for media and > democracy, the latest being last year's MTV Europe "Free Your Mind" award. > Early this year he was named one of this year's hundred Global Leaders for > Tomorrow by the World Economic Forum. > -- > Veran Matic, Editor in Chief tel: +381-11-322-9109 > Radio B92, Belgrade, Yugoslavia fax: +381-11-322-4378 > Radio B92 Official Web Site --- http://www.b92.net/