Bojana Pejic on Fri, 14 May 1999 10:35:18 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: Vlada Petric: RE Susan Sontag |
From: Milovan Destil Markovic <mar.tol@snafu.de To: "Bojana Pejic (E-Mail)" <bo.pejic@snafu.de Subject: Odgovor na Susan Sontag: Vlada Petric Beograd.com Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 02:41:06 +0200 Introduction It seems that 50 days of persistent bombing of Yugoslavia, with repeated "collateral damage" and increasing numbers of innocent citizens killed due to "unintentional errors," has produced a unique effect on people of Yugoslav extraction in this country. This phenomenon is particularly interesting from a psychological standpoint, because the emotional impact of the inhuman destruction affects individuals directly, regardless of their political persuasion or social background. As a result, more and more Americans of Yugoslav origin, who left the Communist regime and involved themselves wholeheartedly in the social, economic, and cultural life of the United States, are beginning to reconsider their faith in the "New World Order." Also among the disillusioned are those who were born in this country, but have become gradually aware of the injustice and double standards their government exercises towards the land of their fathers. Vlada Petric, renowned film theorist and professor at the Visual Arts Department, Harvard University, has spent three decades teaching at various American universities, and was the first Curator of the Harvard Film Archive. Throughout this period he did not participate in any political action in this country, dedicating all his intellectual capacity to education, but he vigorously supported the massive demonstrations against Milosevic's authoritarian regime in Yugoslavia. Triggered by the article in The New York Times Magazine, in which Susan Sontag justifies the NATO aggression on Yugoslavia, Professor Petric felt compelled to get involved and wrote a response to Sontag, which appears here. Editor Why Are We Bombing Kosovo? - How Susan Sontag Promotes War - by prof. Vlada Petric Realizing that the NATO attack on Yugoslavia "has been bungled," the initiators and supporters of this military intervention in Europe are now trying to present the action as a "moral" issue. In her article entitled "Why Are We in Kosovo?" (The New York Times Magazine, May 2, 1999), Susan Sontag provides for the war a rationalization that sounds like a call to revenge. Instead of asking her ill-conceived question, it is more appropriate to ask, "Why Are We Bombing Kosovo?" Because by bombing Kosovo--and Yugoslavia, for that matter--we will never "be" in Kosovo. To achieve this and to resolve the Kosovo conflict--which Sontag irresponsibly proclaims "not that complicated"--there exist only two options: a) Instant invasion that would involve bitter fighting on the ground, resulting in great casualties among the soldiers (which one can argue to be justifiable), with enormous losses of innocent people on all sides. b) Persistent negotiations that may last long, yet are worth every innocent human being destroyed by the brutal military machine and by single-minded political thinkers like Sontag. Untouched by the tragic aspect of the situation in the Kosovo province of Yugoslavia, Sontag recommends war as the best solution, posing yet another question: "How can you stop those bent on genocide without war?" It seems inconceivable that an artist, who is supposed to put humanistic ideals above politics, can conceive such a question, and conclude that "not all wars are unjust." In her mind, the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia is a "just war" (read: "just aggression") although it "has been bungled," but she fails to explain why this war is doing badly. To do so, she would have to admit that, after NATO intervention, the number of Albanian Kosovar refugees who had to leave their homes has increased from a trickle to a flood, while many hundreds of innocent people have been killed throughout Serbia, Montenegro, and Kosovo, due to "technical and logistic errors." In a "just" war, of course, errors must be justified, and Sontag assumes the role of an arbitrator who declares that it is "only a small portion of the suffering that the Milosevic government has inflicted on neighboring peoples." What a grotesque rationalization: a "small portion" of the prescribed punishment of a people for the misdeeds committed by both their own and other leaders! This implies blind retribution that can only ignite more hatred and continue the killing. As an educator, I fortunately learned that such a vindictive method of "teaching" people how to behave does not work, since it expands violence and encourages retaliation. Dividing wars between "just" and "unjust," Sontag estimates how much retaliation is "necessary" to punish the nation she proclaims as the sole culprit for the war in what once was Yugoslavia. She readily equates the Serbian people with the Milosevic regime, which is like declaring the Russian people responsible for the Stalinist atrocities, or claiming that all Germans are guilty for what Hitler did to the Jews, Gypsies, Serbs, and other ethnic minorities in Europe. Only a mind infected by hatred can produce and popularize such a monstrous concept. To support her thesis, Sontag recalls her experience in Sarajevo during the Summer of 1993, comparing the ethnic civil war in Yugoslavia with the Nazi slaughter of the German Jews. Again, her comparison is tendentious and severely flawed, motivated by one-sidedness. Certainly, the shelling of Dubrovnik, Sarajevo, Vukovar--as well as ethnic cleansing--is wrong, just as the bombing of Belgrade, Novi Sad, Nis, Podgorica, Pristina, and many other cities in Yugoslavia is wrong and counter-productive. Moreover, bombing as an ultimatum cannot bring the warring parties to a negotiating table, particularly if the "supreme judge" unequivocally supports only one side in the conflict. Promotion of war, whether labeled as "just" or "unjust," is a crime against humane consciousness, because it excludes concern for the innocent citizens trapped in the power struggle for political, military, and economic supremacy. Deaf to the cries of the innocent Yugoslav citizens threatened by NATO bombs, Sontag proposes bloody retribution as a "just reaction" to the Kosovo conflict, and poses her final question "Can we really say that there is no response to this?" Of course, there is and should be a response, but not by warmongering and encouraging more bloodshed, as Sontag does, with the pretense of extinguishing the "radical evil in the world." By killing innocent people, Susan, you would create more evil in the world. There have always been those who glorified war as a means of resolving discord between states and nations and some even label wars as "holy," blessed by God. Today, when nothing is sacred any more, we have to oppose ideas that place ideology above human life, instead of contributing to the supercilious militaristic logic that is "a dangerous aberration of human consciousness," as Mirko Kovac, the great Serbian writer and both Susan's and my friend, would say. Unconcerned with peoples' suffering and the multiplication of innocent victims, Susan Sontag promotes her "just" war" from an Italian coffee bar on the sunny Adriatic coast. Professor Vlada Petric taught film history at the Visual Department, Harvard University from 1973-1997. He is the founder and first Curator of the Harvard Film Archive. Retired, he lives in Cambridge, completing his two books on film theory and aesthetics. ______________________________________________________________ Milovan Destil Markovic Atelier: Tel/Fax +49(30)6239503 mar.tol@snafu.de Under Construction: www.snafu.de/~mar.tol Monumentenstr.24 D-10965 Berlin Tel: +49(30)7866599 ----------------------------- Bojana Pejic bo.pejic@snafu.de Phone/Fax: (+49) 30-787 52 90 ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate/ to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress