Zarana Papic on Tue, 25 May 1999 13:41:25 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: an article: kosovo crisis as hatred power engine] |
Zarana Papic Women's Studies Center Belgrade Kosovo Crisis as Hatred Power Engine Kosovo crisis is at the heart of the decade long war drama of the late country called Yugoslavia. The symbolic sign of the scope of immensely shallow (mis)understanding of the late country's destiny is (for us who remember) today painfully visible in CNN headlines: "War in Yugoslavia". What "Yugoslavia" the world is talking about today? The trick with people's memory and amnesia is maybe unintentional, but it's equally misleading. The "Yugoslavia" CNN is talking about today is exactly the "phantom Yugoslavia" Milosevic would like us to take it for granted. "Yugoslavia" does not exist any more. Serbia and Montenegro proclaimed themselves as Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1992, but have never been recognized by UN. Milosevic's Serbo-centric claim to be the only rightful "inheritor" of the former Yugoslavia is yet unfulfilled, as its seat in the UN is still empty. Even more, this war is not the war of this self-proclaimed Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, at all, but only a war of Milosevic's Serbia. Montenegro is, in an ironic sense, a double collateral civilian victim: by Milosevic who persists in keeping her puppet-republic status and by NATO that is bombing Milosevic controlled military forces there. The war in former Yugoslavia practically started in 1987 when Milosevic, upon his Stalinist style taking state-power by taking over Serbian Communist Party, started to build up his power-system on one basic principle: feed the antagonisms among people - endless series of antagonisms among Serbs, Albanians, Croats, Slovenes, Bosnians: cultural, historical, ethnic, national and racist antagonisms. And, at the same time, claim shamelessly to be the only "true' defender of the "Yugoslavian Idea" Yes, "racist" first, because "race/ethnicity/nationality" today is, in fact, a political category - an instrument of the "definitive Other" with whom life together is no longer possible. That's why the Kosovo crisis is at the heart of the decade long drama of the late country called Yugoslavia. The destiny of former Yugoslavia was directed towards war when Milosevic started to feed the hatred of Serbians against Albanians as the "legitimate" feeling and even as the "basic" part of "immagined" post-communist Serbian national identity. When this big, undeniable (as Serbs and Albanians are not of the same "race") hatred was unleashed, the series of "minor" hatreds were imminent - and wars in Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina were made possible. Now, the circle of crime came to its starting point. The series of wars in former Yugoslavia is a series of culturally, politically and military produced hatreds. Milosevic is a master of handling hatreds to its own ends. Among men, above all. More precisely, wars in former Yugoslavia is a series of ill fated, unsuccessful and deadly revengeful "broken brotherhoods". Tito's Yugoslavia laid all its hopes in multi-national, multi-ethnic and multi-confessional federation vitality on one identity/difference male dominated principle: under the slogan "brotherhood and unity". After a decade full only of "brotherly killings", it's more than obvious that former Yugoslav "brothers" were the easiest tool of destructive politics. Milosevic (ab)used the Serb's "trauma" under Tito as the most lethal instrument against all other nations. Instead of slowly democratic process of disillusioning from the Changer-la of ideological "brotherhood and unity", their waking-up was more like from a cultural delirium tremens: since 1987 politically and culturally defined "Serbianhood" didn't know exactly what "it" is but was absolutely ready to find that out only through hating others, or being coldly indifferent to their destiny. That's why, among other things, in Serbia there has never been significant democratic alternatives to war-politics of Milosevic. Even the so-called opposition "men-leaders" could not help themselves and took part, each to his abilities, in this "I-don't-mind-if-you-are-cleansed" game. The only political subjects in Serbia who dared to challenge this deadly game, since the beginning of wars in 1991, were some (now very much marginalised) women politicians and some feminist and pacifist groups, whose significance is mostly of symbolic and marginal weight. Women (and some men) from Belgrade's Women in Black were the only ones who, ever since 1991, raised their voice against hateful elimination of the Others. They were the only ones who cared enough and opposed the hate-politics publicly stating: "Bosnian, Albanian, Croat, Roma women are our sisters". Now, as the series of wars since 1991 came to Kosovo as its "birth place", the indifference to the destruction of the Other is more evident than ever. The "happy-to-persecute-traitors" new marshal law, the media and otherwise (public&private) legitimated indifference to violating life of many others, the dominant "taboo" on remembering (not to mention speaking loud at this moment) that Albanians are human beings brutally cleansed from Kosovo, and the seductive narcissim over being (finally) a victim of NATO bombings, shows now so clearly the real face of all previous wars, of Kosovo war, and of what politically and historically became of Serbia today. Belgrade, May 20th, 1999 ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress