Bruce Sterling on Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:18:15 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: recriminations versus prognostications |
>"for example "insomnia" disappearing, & Bruce Sterling firing opinions >from Texas, where among other things he scribbles about high-tech war" Yeah. Speaking of which, is 'insomnia' still alive? Anybody have any idea? To join the interesting Syndicate debate on moral responsibility, I can only concur that trying to avert future ghastly acts is a vastly more worthy act than moaning over the many, many past ones. After all, history only moves in one direction. Given time, the human race can only accumulate more crimes. "Australian" people, for instance, can only wring their hands over a mere three or four centuries' worth of various national-identity enormities. If "Australia" were eight centuries old instead, would a newborn baby Australian be twice as weighed-down with Australian historical guilt (perhaps even as badly-off morally as "Austrians")? When do we get to draw two red lines under history and bury that which is dead within us? At this historical point, personally, I feel quite inclined to grant the "German people," whoever the heck they are, a blanket moral amnesty for the twentieth century. With the New Year 2000, acts of benign forgiveness and heartfelt reconciliation are in order. No, not for any dark, revanchist Yugoslavs, but for *Germans.* I must say that I have the kindliest feelings toward Germans, after this particular European war. After all, the Germans a very different people now than they were 50 years ago; their country has doubled in size, they're run by pinko green peaceniks who bet their political futures on a struggle against European ethnic cleansing, they're picking up big financial tabs for the necessary reconstruction, what the heck more do we want from Germans? I therefore constructively pledge that I am going to make a personal moral effort to no longer make any wounding remarks about the untoward deeds of the grandparents of 21st century Germans. Henceforth, when "Godwin's Law" Internet flame wars degenerate into accusations of Nazidom, flame wars should instead degenerate into accusations of Serbian ethnic cleansing. If we really need an ethnic group to glow in our moral darkness for the next fifty years, we've got them. Welcome to the barrel, Serbia. As for the United States and its lively domestic history of ethnic cleansing, people around the world should just plain *know better* than to provoke a shootout with a superpower who proudly names its weapons of battlefield destruction after the very people it ethnically cleansed -- "tomahawks" -- "Apaches. " This is not unthinking blundering irony here, this is a very scary *message.* People with this kind of schizoid ahistorical ability should not be provoked by mere Europeans. Really, let's face it, it's not that difficult to get Americans not to bomb you. Most people on Earth haven't been bombed by Americans in over fifty years. Worst of all, if you're a minor power, the Americans can bomb the daylights out of you, and you can't do anything more effective about it than to drag your casualties in front of CNN. What is the military point? You're *crazy* to fool with these people. *The world has the advantage of a battlefield lull now. But the military realpolitik of this situation is that the United States blew the living daylights out of a minor regional power without losing a single soldier. This can only encourage the United States. The greater Balkans war is not over, of course. NATO may well "lose the peace" if one too many Marines steps on a punjee stick. But we do have a breathing space, and rather than rehearse recriminations, we'd be better off to rehearse what comes next. *And what comes next? *Bombing campaigns* and Tomahawks by the basketfull, that's what comes next. It's dead obvious. Given any breakdown in the Balkans, the kneejerk response of the American military will be to blow up Serbia, again, *ten times harder,* *ten times faster,* with *less* need to ask permission of anybody, and with a yawning public indifference to Serbian civilian casualties. Contrary to urgent Serbian propaganda, nobody much in the US feels at all morally panicked because a living hell broke out on the ground in Kosova "after the American bombing started." Even if American air strikes killed Kosovars galore during the ghastly Serbian pogrom, what the hell is that to Americans? Americans will fight a war in Europe down to the last Kosovar any day that you please. The United States Air Force is not one whit demoralized by the public sufferings of Serbians. Americans in general are serenely undisturbed by the fact that NATO smashed Serbian bridges, and refineries, and the occasional maternity hospital, while the Serbs were bulldozing Kosovar villages wholesale. Americans have quite a large historical tolerance for randomly blowing the shit out of alien people by remote control. Americans do this all the time, they're very used to it. The Americans are just not going to get all upset about it, and nobody should realistically expect this of the Americans. And the Serbian response to NATO air war has been hugely *encouraging* to this American behavior. Now America knows what to do with Serbians. I predict that our next Balkans spectacle will not be cruise missiles, however. It will be the amazing scene of NATO powers flying bread to hungry Serbians who have no jobs. The Serbs won't eat the bread, of course -- the Serbs are far too proud -- but they'll eat the bread after it's stolen by the Milosevic family mafia, and ritually re-labelled. Then it will become Serbian moral-victory miracle bread. That bread jumped spontaneously out of the holy Serbian soil around the heroically defended graveyards. Bon appetit. ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress