McKenzie Wark on Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:06:37 +1000 (EST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: Collective Responsibility |
RESPONSIBILITY IS NOT THE SAME AS GUILT RESPONSIBILITY IS NOT THE SAME AS GUILT RESPONSIBILITY IS NOT THE SAME AS GUILT Sorry about the shouting, but so long as this confusion exists, we get nowhere. Particularly when denial of guilt gets used, by way of slippage, as denial of responsibility. Responsibility means (as Levinas says) an ethical commitment to listening to the other. To respond, in some minimal way, to the claim the other has on us. And what does the other speak about to us? About suffering. About their suffering. And what is our response? I didn't inflict that suffering. It has nothing to do with me. I'm not guilty. Somebody else is guilty. What concern is it of mine that someone is suffering? Etc. To which, as I read him, Levinas says, NOT FUCKING GOOD ENOUGH PAL Now, somebody may very well be guilty. Make no mistake about that. Somebody killed. Somebody raped. Somebody gave the order. Somebody pulled the trigger. Justice requires that we listen, and respond, to the claim of wrongdoing, to the claim that someone in particular actually caused harm. But just because I am not guilty does not resolve me of responsibility. If I want to belong to the human community, if I want to claim a right to it, then I must also face up to a responsibility. One that is quite minimal really -- to hear the other. But also quite a burden, because the other tells me, again and again, about suffering. One thing you get to see, in times like these, is who the people are who understand responsibility, not necessarily as a concept, more as a culture, as just something you do. It's there every day in my inbox, from syndicate and from nettime and just from friends forwarding me things. The attempt to listen, to hear the other. To witness. It may not seem like it is doing much, all this witnessing. People still get killed. Old wrongs go unrighted. It may not be sufficient, to bring about justice, this practice of responsibility. But it is necessary to it, nonetheless. There is no justice, there is no community, there is no belonging, there is no identity -- without it. There is solipsism or there is responsibility. Choose. __________________________________________ "We no longer have roots, we have aerials." http://www.mcs.mq.edu.au/~mwark -- McKenzie Wark ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress