Alan Sondheim on Mon, 21 May 2001 02:35:12 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> no people. |
I'm not sure how to answer this since it's already cut into the fabric of an in-joke. What is nettime exactly? A place for cultural work, cultural politics? A place of discussion? A place of textual dissemination? Of cultural produc- tion? It's all of these. I write texts; these particular ones deal with the stereotyping of others - animals whose characteristics are related primarily to those of first-grade readers, at least in the United States, at least when I was a child. The 'noble lion' and so forth. So this is nothing more than a list of these characteristics and their negation and a somewhat edgy denial of the negation, the whole in quota- tion marks. I think nettime has room for my work and Kenji Seratori's and NN's and a variety of textual practices, all of which from one or another viewpoint, might leave one clueless; I know when I first saw Kenji's work, I didn't know what to make of it, for example. Having been at the ELO awards and the EPoetry conference - both within the past few weeks - I feel there's place for many modes of thinking, working through ideas. I apologize if you feel that this is a nettime in-joke; in fact, I feel, like many others, outside of the nettime mainstream, such as it might be. But I also feel there's room for all of this. Finally, not sure what you mean about invisible quotation marks; mine are evident in the piece, but beyond that, I'm not quoting anyone. Alan _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold