Simon Biggs on Tue, 9 Nov 1999 18:35:06 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> The Rise of dot-communism (2x) |
>I understood that there was an issue with the president not being elected by >the people, but rather by some other governing branch (sorry if I sound >ignorant - don't worry it won't stop me ;-) and that there were people who >wanted to wait for a new referendum. ----- There are good arguments for both directly elected and non-elected appointed heads of state. It depends on what you want your head of state to do. If you require them to lead or participate in the executive then they must be directly elected. If you only require them to be a figure head and an emergency back up system then the democratic process isn't really necessary. In fact, in this scenario, a directly elected head of state would be problematic as they would potentially be able to exercise greater power than they are constitutionally allowed by invoking their popular mandate. An appointed head of state is thus a better option in this situation, as in Germany, where the executive lies with parliament; not like France - where it is split - or the USA, where it lies firmly in the hands of the head of state. All of these approaches have problems of course. As for finding it hard to get good help...people usually get the leaders they deserve. As for Oz, I suspect that the arguments there, like anywhere, were primarily emotional. I doubt that the right choice has been made, no matter how democratic its process. Simon Biggs London GB simon@babar.demon.co.uk http://www.easynet.co.uk/simonbiggs/ Professor of Research (Fine Art) Art and Design Research Centre School of Cultural Studies Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield, UK http://www.shu.ac.uk/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net