Axel Diederich on Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:43:43 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[rohrpost] Re: <nettime> thesis on Amsterdam's Digital City: "Rise andFall of DDS" |
At 19.11.01 15:35, you wrote: >Hi Nettime, > >Geert asked me to post an announcement here that I wrote a thesis on >DDS. You can download it in 5 different formats at >http://reinder.rustema.nl/dds/ ranging in size from 1MB for RTF to >96Kb as doc for your Palm handheld. > >The thesis is an historical study in combination with an evaluation. > >The history of DDS is cut in four periods: the experimental 10 weeks >in 1994, the transformation into an institution in 1995, the >competition with the internet in 1996-2000 and finally the >commercialisation. You should know that DDS became an ordinary >discount ISP a few months ago and completely dropped any commitment >to the public domain. > >The 4 periods are evaluated in relation to four themes: social >cohesion, third place, freedom of information and democratisation. >That is 'third place' indeed, and not public place or public sphere a >la Habermas. A minor but hopefully interesting difference. > >What I have learned from writing this whole thing is that it is >incredibly difficult to institutionalise whatever collaborative >'space' in cyberspace if you want to do justice to the beautiful >internet culture. You know, the old fashioned one, with a >gift-economy etcetera. If you want to do this you can at best make >sure that the protocols and software licenses you use are open, free >and compatible and decisions are made on the internet itself in >discussions. The problems really start when you come up with >interfaces nobody but some central authority can alter. Like in the >case of DDS and their WWW interface. An on-line community also should >not grow to big. At best it should have a few hundred members, but >once you want to become as big as possible (why should you? to >attract advertisers?) the whole community falls apart. > >Anyway, that's what I learned from this study but if you read it >yourself you probably will get lots of other and/or interesting ideas. > >I tried to avoid difficult words as much as possible (English is not >even my first language, so that helps as a crap filter) and there are >some entertaining parts. I hope. > >It's 77 pages to print from the PDF, but if you leave out appendix 5 >and 6 (which are in Dutch) you need only 60 pages. I don't know how >the difference translates into dead trees. > >About me: I am somebody. In the beginning of 2001 I launched the idea >to buy DDS as inhabitants in order to resue it. This resulted in an >association with the name Open Domein (Open Domain) which is now >trying to live up to the old DDS ideals. One day something >interesting might grow out of it I think. > > >-- >ReindeR > ># distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission ># <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, ># collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets ># more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body ># archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net ------------------------------------------------------- rohrpost - deutschsprachige Liste fuer Medien- und Netzkultur Archiv: http://www.nettime.org/rohrpost Info: http://www.mikro.org/rohrpost Ent/Subskribieren: http://post.openoffice.de